Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991707›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Regional heterogeneity and unexpectedly high abundance of Cooperia punctata in beef cattle at a northern latitude revealed by ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding.

Eranga Lakshitha De Seram, Elizabeth Mary Redman, Felicity Kaye Wills, Camila de Queiroz, John Ross Campbell, Cheryl Lynne Waldner, Sarah Elizabeth Parker, Russell William Avramenko, John Stuart Gilleard, Fabienne Dominique Uehlinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eranga Lakshitha De SeramUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Elizabeth Mary RedmanUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Felicity Kaye WillsUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Camila de QueirozUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
John Ross CampbellUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Cheryl Lynne WaldnerUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Sarah Elizabeth ParkerUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Russell William AvramenkoUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
John Stuart GilleardUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. jsgillea@ucalgary.ca.
Fabienne Dominique UehlingerUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. f.uehlinger@usask.ca.
University of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Agriculture Development Fund, Government of Saskatchewan, Canada 20150268Beef Cattle Research Council ANH.04.17Beef Cattle Research Council ANH.23.13Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2015-03976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe species composition of cattle gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) communities can vary greatly between regions. Despite this, there is remarkably little large-scale surveillance data for cattle GIN species which is due, at least in part, to a lack of scalable diagnostic tools. This lack of regional GIN species-level data represents a major knowledge gap for evidence-based parasite management and assessing the status and impact of factors such as climate change and anthelmintic drug resistance.

methodsThis paper presents a large-scale survey of GIN in beef herds across western Canada using ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding. Individual fecal samples were collected from 6 to 20 randomly selected heifers (n = 1665) from each of 85 herds between September 2016 and February 2017 and 10-25 first season calves (n = 824) from each of 42 herds between November 2016 and February 2017.

resultsGastrointestinal nematode communities in heifers and calves were similar in Alberta and Saskatchewan, with Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia oncophora being the predominant GIN species in all herds consistent with previous studies. However, in Manitoba, Cooperia punctata was the predominant species overall and the most abundant GIN species in calves from 4/8 beef herds.

conclusionsThis study revealed a marked regional heterogeneity of GIN species in grazing beef herds in western Canada. The predominance of C. punctata in Manitoba is unexpected, as although this parasite is often the predominant cattle GIN species in more southerly latitudes, it is generally only a minor component of cattle GIN communities in northern temperate regions. We hypothesize that the unexpected predominance of C. punctata at such a northerly latitude represents a range expansion, likely associated with changes in climate, anthelmintic use, management, and/or animal movement. Whatever the cause, these results are of practical concern since C. punctata is more pathogenic than C. oncophora, the Cooperia species that typically predominates in cooler temperate regions. Finally, this study illustrates the value of ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding as a surveillance tool for ruminant GIN parasites.

Indexed as

AlbertaAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEcosystemFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractMaleManitobaParasite Egg CountSaskatchewanTrichostrongyloideaTrichostrongyloidiasisDNA, Ribosomal SpacerBeef herdsCattle gastrointestinal nematodesCooperiaC. punctataITS-2 rDNANemabiome metabarcodingNorthern latitudes

Identifiers

PMID34991707
PMCPMC8734358
OpenAlexW4206818038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.