Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991681›Full record

ArticleBioPsychoSocial medicine2022

Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on japanese patients with eating disorders -a cross-sectional study.

Shu Takakura, Kenta Toda, Makoto Yamashita, Tomoko Kitajima, Takafumi Suematsu, Hiroaki Yokoyama, Chie Suzuyama Asou, Tomokazu Hata, Nobuyuki Sudo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioPsychoSocial medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shu TakakuraDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. takakura.shu.408@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Kenta TodaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Makoto YamashitaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomoko KitajimaFukuoka Prefectural Support Base Hospital for Eating Disorders, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takafumi SuematsuFukuoka Prefectural Support Base Hospital for Eating Disorders, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroaki YokoyamaFukuoka Prefectural Support Base Hospital for Eating Disorders, Fukuoka, Japan.
Chie Suzuyama AsouFukuoka Prefectural Support Base Hospital for Eating Disorders, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomokazu HataDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuyuki SudoDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fukuoka Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Scociety for the Promotion of Science No. 21H00957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown had a considerable impact on eating disorders (EDs). We evaluated the clinical features of Japanese ED patients before and after the first COVID-19 outbreak-related state of emergency (April 7, 2020).

methodsWe studied 148 patients who were divided into two groups based on when they arrived at our clinic: before (Before group: n = 86) or after (After group: n = 62) the start of the first state of emergency. All patients completed the Japanese versions of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) and Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI).

resultsThe After group was substantially younger than the Before group (p = .0187). Regardless of the ED type, patients who developed an ED during the first state of emergency tended to be significantly younger than those who developed one before. Differences in EDI characteristics were observed between the two groups. The PBI care subscale was notably higher (p = .0177) in the After group. The PBI maternal care subscale was the only statistically significant factor associated with age (β = -0.35, p < .0001).

conclusionsHome confinement associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing increase in parent-child closeness may have influenced the decreased age of ED patients at their initial consultation. Treatment interventions should consider the differences in the clinical features of EDs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Eating disorder inventoryEating disordersMaternal careParental bonding instrument

Identifiers

PMID34991681
PMCPMC8733913
OpenAlexW4206362647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.