Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991610›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Risk factors for the accuracy of the initial diagnosis of malaria cases in China: a decision-tree modelling approach.

Gang Li, Donglan Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Da Feng, Xinyan Cai, Xiaoyu Chen, Shangfeng Tang, Zhanchun Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Increase in ImportedOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Magnitude and patterns of severeFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang LiSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-2907
Donglan ZhangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-4721
Zhuo ChenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-3489
Da FengSchool of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-150X
Xinyan CaiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-6531
Xiaoyu ChenSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-7571
Shangfeng TangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-2486
Zhanchun FengSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China. zcfeng@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6021-0016
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Nottingham Ningbo China · CN

Funding

national natural science foundation of china 72074088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly accurate diagnosis and risk assessment for malaria are crucial for improving patients' terminal prognosis and preventing them from progressing to a severe or critical stage. This study aims to describe the accuracy of the initial diagnosis of malaria cases with different characteristics and the factors that affect the accuracy in the context of the agenda for a world free of malaria.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 494 patients admitted to hospitals with a diagnosis of malaria from January 2014 through December 2016. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and decision tree analysis was performed to predict the probability of patients who may be misdiagnosed.

resultsOf the 494 patients included in this study, the proportions of patients seeking care in county-level, prefecture-level and provincial-level hospitals were 27.5% (n = 136), 26.3% (n = 130) and 8.3% (n = 41), respectively; the proportions of patients seeking care in clinic, township health centre and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention were 25.9% (n = 128), 4.1% (n = 20), and 7.9% (n = 39), respectively. Nearly 60% of malaria patients were misdiagnosed on their first visit, and 18.8% had complications. The median time from onset to the first visit was 2 days (IQR: 0-3 days), and the median time from the first visit to diagnosis was 3 days (IQR: 0-4 days). The decision tree classification of malaria patients being misdiagnosed consisted of six categorical variables: healthcare facilities for the initial diagnosis, time interval between onset and initial diagnosis, region, residence type, insurance status, and age.

conclusionsInsufficient diagnostic capacity of healthcare facilities with lower administrative levels for the first visit was the most important risk factor in misdiagnosing patients. To reduce diagnostic errors, clinicians, government decision-makers and communities should consider strengthening the primary care facilities, the time interval between onset and initial diagnosis, residence type, and health insurance status.

Indexed as

Decision TreesAdolescentAdultChildChinaDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMalariaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultDecision treeGeographic variationHealthcare institutionsHealth seeking behaviour

Identifiers

PMID34991610
PMCPMC8740495
OpenAlexW4206110540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.