ArticleBMC public health2022
The experiences, needs and barriers of people with impairments related to usability and accessibility of digital health solutions, levels of involvement in the design process and strategies for participatory and universal design: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Digital Interventions on the Treatment Burden of Patients With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Worldwide prevalence of protozoans and helminths among disabled people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Patient Perspectives to Inform Co-creation of Wearable-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Early Flare Detection and Management in IBD: A Survey-Based Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Practical Digital Competence and Psychosocial Well-Being Among Adults with Severe Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Indirect Associations Through Perceived Self-Determination in Daily Life.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use Digital Healthcare Services: A Cross-Sectional PLS-SEM Study on the Shukhee App in Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Inclusive Digital Health Strategies for Persons With Disabilities: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Centering Equity During Health Technology Innovation: Scoping Review of Methods and Research Adjustments to Promote Inclusive Coproduction.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An Eye-Tracking Study on Text Accessibility and Comprehension in University Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring online and in-person mental healthcare access and app use in a cohort of people living with disability: results from the 2019 and 2020 California Health Interview Survey.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Feasibility of smartphone-based digital phenotyping to measure visual function and mental health outcomes in patients with inherited retinal diseases.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- User-Centered Design for Digital Patient-Navigation Tools in Oncology: Scoping Review.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Designing digital mental health interventions for older adults: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Discoverability and characteristics of health and fitness apps for deaf/hard-of-hearing and blind/low-vision users.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Quality of Web-Based Patient Education on Osteoporosis Lifestyle Changes.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2026Article
- "Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Centering disability in digital health: perspectives and actionable approaches to accessibility.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Health care Experiences of Educated Young Adults With Blindness in the Digital Age: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A Call for Inclusion: Children With Intellectual Disabilities in Trauma Treatment Research.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2025Article
- The digital intelligent precise nursing framework: theory development in health recommender system.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- ConnectUp: Co-Designing an Online Social Connection Platform with People with Disabilities and Carers.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGlobally, the number of digital health solutions is increasing, but they are not always designed with access and utilisation for people with impairments in mind. Development efforts have often not included the voice and requirements of people with impairments, who make up 15% of the world's population, despite the fact that this can help ensure broad access and utilisation. Little attention to and limited inclusion of people with impairments in the development of digital health solutions results in continued and reinforced inequalities in health services provision for people with impairments. This review investigates the needs and barriers of people with impairments related to use of digital health solutions and strategies to foster user participation, access and utilisation of digital health solutions.
methodsThis scoping review, based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual, had five phases: 1) identification of aim and research questions, 2) literature search in five databases (April/May 2020), 3) literature screening based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4) data extraction, and (5) reporting results.
resultsThe literature search resulted in 5968 sources, of which 25 met our inclusion criteria. People with impairments appreciate digital health solutions that are designed to meet their specific impairment-related challenges. The reported needs and barriers related to technological design varied depending on the individuals' challenges. The literature reported different types of participatory co-design strategies to foster access and utilisation of digital health solutions.
conclusionThis scoping review support needs for increased awareness among developers to design solutions that meet people's needs, contexts and states of health. By applying universal design as a strategy and including people with different types of impairments, starting in the idea creation phase of digital health solutions and throughout the development, developers can design solutions with better accessibility. Digital health solutions that are accessible and usable have a tremendous opportunity to foster health equity and achieve health promotion, prevention and self-care. This in turn can contribute to closing the gap between different population groups, reduce disparities and get the most from available healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.