Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991529›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

The Gutenberg health study: a five-year prospective analysis of psychosocial working conditions using COPSOQ (Copenhagen psychosocial Questoinnaire) and ERI (effort-reward imbalance).

Matthias Nuebling, Janice Hegewald, Karla Romero Starke, Hans-Joachim Lincke, Sylvia Jankowiak, Falk Liebers, Ute Latza, Stephan Letzel, Merle Riechmann-Wolf, Emilio Gianicolo and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Individual and Work-Related Predictors of Exhaustion in East and West Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias Nuebling *FFAW: Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences, Bertoldstr. 63, D-79098, Freiburg, Germany. nuebling@ffaw.de.
Janice Hegewald *Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Karla Romero StarkeInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Hans-Joachim LinckeFFAW: Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences, Bertoldstr. 63, D-79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Sylvia JankowiakDivision Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health BAuA, Berlin, Germany.
Falk LiebersDivision Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health BAuA, Berlin, Germany.
Ute LatzaDivision Work and Health, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health BAuA, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan LetzelInstitute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Merle Riechmann-WolfInstitute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Emilio GianicoloInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Manfred BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Norbert PfeifferDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Klaus LacknerInstitute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas MünzelCenter of Thrombosis and Hemostatis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Philipp S WildCenter of Thrombosis and Hemostatis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andreas SeidlerInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEResearch Centre for Applied System Safety and Industrial Medicine · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychosocial working conditions were previously analyzed using the first recruitment wave of the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) cohort (n = 5000). We aimed to confirm the initial analysis using the entire GHS population at baseline (N = 15,010) and at the five-year follow-up. We also aimed to determine the effects of psychosocial working conditions at baseline on self-rated outcomes measured at follow-up.

methodsAt baseline, working GHS participants were assessed with either the Effort-Reward-Imbalance questionnaire (ERI) (n = 4358) or with the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) (n = 4322); participants still working after five years received the same questionnaire again (ERI n = 3142; COPSOQ n = 3091). We analyzed the association between working conditions and the outcomes job satisfaction, general health, burnout, and satisfaction with life at baseline, at follow-up and also prospectively from baseline to follow-up using linear regression models. We examined the outcome variance explained by the models (R

resultsThe models' R

conclusionsBoth the COPSOQ and ERI instruments show good criterion validity and adequately predict contemporaneously measured self-reported measurements of health and (occupational) well-being. However, the COPSOQ provides a more detailed picture of working conditions and might be preferable for improvment strategies in workplaces. Additional prospective research with shorter follow-up times would be beneficial for estimating dose-response relationships.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalJob SatisfactionHumansRewardStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadWorkplaceCOPSOQERIHealthLongitudinal studyPredictionProspective studyPsychosocial factorsRisk assessmentSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID34991529
PMCPMC8740453
OpenAlexW4206673034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.