Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991518›Full record

Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2022

Stabilization of refractive error and associated factors following small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Ammar M Khan, Derek M Waldner, Micah Luong, Emi Sanders, Andrew C S Crichton, Bryce A Ford

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ammar M KhanDivision of Ophthalmology, University of Calgary, 49 Richard Way SW, Calgary, AB, T3E 7M8, Canada. ammar34@gmail.com.
Derek M WaldnerCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Micah LuongDivision of Ophthalmology, University of Calgary, 49 Richard Way SW, Calgary, AB, T3E 7M8, Canada.
Emi SandersDivision of Ophthalmology, University of Calgary, 49 Richard Way SW, Calgary, AB, T3E 7M8, Canada.
Andrew C S CrichtonDivision of Ophthalmology, University of Calgary, 49 Richard Way SW, Calgary, AB, T3E 7M8, Canada.
Bryce A FordDivision of Ophthalmology, University of Calgary, 49 Richard Way SW, Calgary, AB, T3E 7M8, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that refractive stabilization occurs rapidly following small incision cataract surgery. Nonetheless, many guidelines still suggest waiting four to 6 weeks before prescribing corrective lenses. This study was undertaken to supplement the existing literature regarding refractive stabilization, and evaluate multiple contributing factors that could dissuade clinicians from confidently correcting refractive error in the early post-operative course following routine cataract surgeries.

methodsAdult patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with uncomplicated surgeries and post-surgical courses at the Calgary Ophthalmology Centre (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) were included in this prospective observational case series. Exclusion criteria included known corneal dystrophies, infectious keratitis, complicated surgery or toric/multifocal IOLs. Data was collected at weekly intervals for a total of 6 weeks. Collected data included autorefraction, visual acuity, corneal pachymetry, and effective lens position.

resultsOne hundred six eyes of 104 patients were included in this study. Post-operative sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent were not significantly different at any post-operative week compared with week six, and 80-86% of patients were within 0.5D of last follow-up spherical equivalent at any week. The secondary outcomes of central corneal thickness, effective lens position and visual acuity did, however, exhibit significant differences between early post-operative weeks and last follow-up values.

conclusionsThese data suggest that refractive error can be effectively measured and corrected as early as one-week post-operatively in the majority of patients, though other measures of post-operative stability including central corneal thickness, effective lens position and visual acuity can require up to 4 weeks to stabilize. Thus a conservative and pragmatic approach may be to wait until 4 weeks post-operatively prior to obtaining refractive correction following uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Indexed as

AstigmatismCataractLenses, IntraocularOphthalmologyPhacoemulsificationRefractive ErrorsAdultHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularRefraction, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID34991518
PMCPMC8734338
OpenAlexW4206410868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.