Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2022
Stabilization of refractive error and associated factors following small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative intraocular lens stability following cataract surgery with or without primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial.International ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Retrospective Assessment of LLM Decision-Making for IOL Power Selection in Cataract Surgery in Comparison with Surgeon Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Postoperative Intraocular Lens Position and Refractive Stability in Cataract Surgery: Influence of Target Refraction and IOL Design.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Capsular tension ring force line and intraocular lens angle on the impact of postoperative astigmatism in Marfan syndrome lens subluxation: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interocular Axial Length Asymmetry and Postoperative Refractive Error After Bilateral Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Evidence Based Analysis Enhances Surgical Outcomes of Novice Resident Surgeons.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Refractive Error Stabilization Following Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery and Its Associated Preoperative Factors.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Article
- Real-World Visual Outcomes and Rotational Stability of a Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery-The Impact of Preoperative Visual Acuity, the Intraocular Lens Model, and the Surgeon's Experience: An Empirical Analysis of Hungarian and Kosovan Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Determination of the time of refractive stability after uneventful phacoemulsification in Indian eyes.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Outcomes of Secondary Intracapsular Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with Refractive Prediction Error after Phacotrabeculectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of visual performance with iTrace analyzer following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of two different trifocal intraocular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research relating to refractive cataract surgery over a 20-year period: from 2003 to 2022.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that refractive stabilization occurs rapidly following small incision cataract surgery. Nonetheless, many guidelines still suggest waiting four to 6 weeks before prescribing corrective lenses. This study was undertaken to supplement the existing literature regarding refractive stabilization, and evaluate multiple contributing factors that could dissuade clinicians from confidently correcting refractive error in the early post-operative course following routine cataract surgeries.
methodsAdult patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery with uncomplicated surgeries and post-surgical courses at the Calgary Ophthalmology Centre (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) were included in this prospective observational case series. Exclusion criteria included known corneal dystrophies, infectious keratitis, complicated surgery or toric/multifocal IOLs. Data was collected at weekly intervals for a total of 6 weeks. Collected data included autorefraction, visual acuity, corneal pachymetry, and effective lens position.
resultsOne hundred six eyes of 104 patients were included in this study. Post-operative sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent were not significantly different at any post-operative week compared with week six, and 80-86% of patients were within 0.5D of last follow-up spherical equivalent at any week. The secondary outcomes of central corneal thickness, effective lens position and visual acuity did, however, exhibit significant differences between early post-operative weeks and last follow-up values.
conclusionsThese data suggest that refractive error can be effectively measured and corrected as early as one-week post-operatively in the majority of patients, though other measures of post-operative stability including central corneal thickness, effective lens position and visual acuity can require up to 4 weeks to stabilize. Thus a conservative and pragmatic approach may be to wait until 4 weeks post-operatively prior to obtaining refractive correction following uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.