Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991510›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2022

The feasibility and acceptability of a classroom-based physical activity program for children attending specialist schools: a mixed-methods pilot study.

Chloe Emonson, Nicole Papadopoulos, Nicole Rinehart, Ana Mantilla, Ian Fuelscher, Lynne M Boddy, Caterina Pesce, Jane McGillivray

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chloe EmonsonDeakin Child Study Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. chloe.emonson@research.deakin.edu.au.
Nicole PapadopoulosDeakin Child Study Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Nicole RinehartDeakin Child Study Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Ana MantillaDeakin Child Study Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Ian FuelscherCentre for Social and Early Emotional Development (SEED), School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Lynne M BoddyResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Caterina PesceDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome, Italy.
Jane McGillivrayDeakin Child Study Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with disabilities often engage in less than the recommended amount of daily physical activity (PA). Classroom-based PA breaks are a favourable method of promoting PA for children. However, evaluations of these programs in specialist schools are scarce, with even less research into their feasibility and acceptability. This may hinder effective implementation and program scalability. This pilot study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a classroom-based PA break program in Australian specialist school classrooms, using the Australian Joy of Moving (AJoM) program.

methodsForty primary/junior classes and their teachers across five specialist schools implemented the AJoM program for eight weeks as the intervention group within a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. A mixed-methods design investigated classroom teachers' (N = 22; 6 males, 16 females) perspectives of the feasibility and acceptability of the program after implementation through semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 7 teachers), qualitative survey responses (n = 18 teachers) and quantitative survey items (n = 19 teachers). Qualitative data were analysed using predominantly deductive thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

resultsClassroom-based PA breaks may be feasible for getting children with disabilities more active at school. However, considerable variation exists in teachers' perception of the AJoM experience. While several teachers indicate that the program content could be pertinent for their class, common divergences in perceptions of feasibility and acceptability appear to relate to the age and developmental level or needs of the students in the class.

conclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of implementing classroom-based PA breaks in specialist schools. However, results demonstrate the importance of (1) allowing a high level of flexibility in the design and implementation of programs to meet the varying needs of class groups and (2) providing a large variety of resources to cater to the heterogeneity of the children.

trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619000193178 ) on 11 February 2019.

Indexed as

ExerciseSchoolsAustraliaChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesAcceptabilityActive breakClassDisabilityFeasibilityPrimary schoolSpecial needs

Identifiers

PMID34991510
PMCPMC8740057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.