Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991450›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Lerna: transformer architectures for configuring error correction tools for short- and long-read genome sequencing.

Atul Sharma, Pranjal Jain, Ashraf Mahgoub, Zihan Zhou, Kanak Mahadik, Somali Chaterji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Atul Sharma *Purdue University, West Lafayette, US.
Pranjal Jain *Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Ashraf MahgoubPurdue University, West Lafayette, US.
Zihan ZhouPurdue University, West Lafayette, US.
Kanak MahadikAdobe Research, San Jose, US.
Somali ChaterjiPurdue University, West Lafayette, US. schaterji@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3651-6362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequencing technologies are prone to errors, making error correction (EC) necessary for downstream applications. EC tools need to be manually configured for optimal performance. We find that the optimal parameters (e.g., k-mer size) are both tool- and dataset-dependent. Moreover, evaluating the performance (i.e., Alignment-rate or Gain) of a given tool usually relies on a reference genome, but quality reference genomes are not always available. We introduce Lerna for the automated configuration of k-mer-based EC tools. Lerna first creates a language model (LM) of the uncorrected genomic reads, and then, based on this LM, calculates a metric called the perplexity metric to evaluate the corrected reads for different parameter choices. Next, it finds the one that produces the highest alignment rate without using a reference genome. The fundamental intuition of our approach is that the perplexity metric is inversely correlated with the quality of the assembly after error correction. Therefore, Lerna leverages the perplexity metric for automated tuning of k-mer sizes without needing a reference genome.

resultsFirst, we show that the best k-mer value can vary for different datasets, even for the same EC tool. This motivates our design that automates k-mer size selection without using a reference genome. Second, we show the gains of our LM using its component attention-based transformers. We show the model's estimation of the perplexity metric before and after error correction. The lower the perplexity after correction, the better the k-mer size. We also show that the alignment rate and assembly quality computed for the corrected reads are strongly negatively correlated with the perplexity, enabling the automated selection of k-mer values for better error correction, and hence, improved assembly quality. We validate our approach on both short and long reads. Additionally, we show that our attention-based models have significant runtime improvement for the entire pipeline-18[Formula: see text] faster than previous works, due to parallelizing the attention mechanism and the use of JIT compilation for GPU inferencing.

conclusionLerna improves de novo genome assembly by optimizing EC tools. Our code is made available in a public repository at: https://github.com/icanforce/lerna-genomics .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBase SequenceGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareAutomated configuration tuningError correctionNanopore readsNatural language processing (NLP)PacBio readsParameter search spacePerplexity metricTransformer networks

Identifiers

PMID34991450
PMCPMC8734100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.