ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
SweepCluster: A SNP clustering tool for detecting gene-specific sweeps in prokaryotes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global spread of Streptococcus pyogenes A genomics-supported narrative review.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gene-specific sweep is a selection process where an advantageous mutation along with the nearby neutral sites in a gene region increases the frequency in the population. It has been demonstrated to play important roles in ecological differentiation or phenotypic divergence in microbial populations. Therefore, identifying gene-specific sweeps in microorganisms will not only provide insights into the evolutionary mechanisms, but also unravel potential genetic markers associated with biological phenotypes. However, current methods were mainly developed for detecting selective sweeps in eukaryotic data of sparse genotypes and are not readily applicable to prokaryotic data. Furthermore, some challenges have not been sufficiently addressed by the methods, such as the low spatial resolution of sweep regions and lack of consideration of the spatial distribution of mutations.
resultsWe proposed a novel gene-centric and spatial-aware approach for identifying gene-specific sweeps in prokaryotes and implemented it in a python tool SweepCluster. Our method searches for gene regions with a high level of spatial clustering of pre-selected polymorphisms in genotype datasets assuming a null distribution model of neutral selection. The pre-selection of polymorphisms is based on their genetic signatures, such as elevated population subdivision, excessive linkage disequilibrium, or significant phenotype association. Performance evaluation using simulation data showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the clustering algorithm in SweepCluster is above 90%. The application of SweepCluster in two real datasets from the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus suis showed that the impact of pre-selection was dramatic and significantly reduced the uninformative signals. We validated our method using the genotype data from Vibrio cyclitrophicus, the only available dataset of gene-specific sweeps in bacteria, and obtained a concordance rate of 78%. We noted that the concordance rate could be underestimated due to distinct reference genomes and clustering strategies. The application to the human genotype datasets showed that SweepCluster is also applicable to eukaryotic data and is able to recover 80% of a catalog of known sweep regions.
conclusionSweepCluster is applicable to a broad category of datasets. It will be valuable for detecting gene-specific sweeps in diverse genotypic data and provide novel insights on adaptive evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.