Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34991444›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular biology letters2022

Specificity of H

Ulrike Zentgraf, Ana Gabriela Andrade-Galan, Stefan Bieker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Plants-2nd Edition.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The ascorbate-glutathione cycle coming of age.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ulrike ZentgrafZMBP (Centre of Plant Molecular Biology), University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 32, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. ulrike.zentgraf@zmbp.uni-tuebingen.de.
Ana Gabriela Andrade-GalanZMBP (Centre of Plant Molecular Biology), University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 32, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Stefan BiekerZMBP (Centre of Plant Molecular Biology), University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 32, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) CRC1101, B06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf senescence is an integral part of plant development and is driven by endogenous cues such as leaf or plant age. Developmental senescence aims to maximize the usage of carbon, nitrogen and mineral resources for growth and/or for the sake of the next generation. This requires efficient reallocation of the resources out of the senescing tissue into developing parts of the plant such as new leaves, fruits and seeds. However, premature senescence can be induced by severe and long-lasting biotic or abiotic stress conditions. It serves as an exit strategy to guarantee offspring in an unfavorable environment but is often combined with a trade-off in seed number and quality. In order to coordinate the very complex process of developmental senescence with environmental signals, highly organized networks and regulatory cues have to be in place. Reactive oxygen species, especially hydrogen peroxide (H

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCellular SenescenceGene Expression Regulation, PlantHydrogen PeroxidePlant LeavesPlant SenescenceHydrogen PeroxideFree oxygen radicalsHydrogen peroxideIntracellular compartmentsLeaf senescenceROSSenescence regulationStromules

Identifiers

PMID34991444
PMCPMC8903538
OpenAlexW4205242808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.