ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic patents2022
Factor IX(a) inhibitors: an updated patent review (2003-present).
Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic patents, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting drug-drug interactions and optimal dosing of betrixaban with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in patients with renal impairment who were coadministered with P-glycoprotein inhibitors.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Pyrazinyl-Substituted Aminoazoles as Covalent Inhibitors of Thrombin: Synthesis, Structure, and Anticoagulant Properties.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Anticoagulants in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: alternatives to standardized anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Review
- 3-(Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Novel Antithrombotic Agents in Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease: Progress in the Search for the Optimal Treatment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Predicting stroke in heart failure and reduced ejection fraction without atrial fibrillation.European heart journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnticoagulation with no bleeding complications is the current objective of drug discovery programs in the area of treating and/or preventing thromboembolism. Despite the promises of therapeutics targeting factors XI(a) and XII(a), none has been approved thus far. Clinically used thrombin- and/or factor Xa-based anticoagulants continue to be associated with a significant bleeding risk which limits their safe use in a broad range of thrombotic patients. Research findings in animals and humans indicate that it is possible to target factor IX(a) (FIX(a)) to achieve anticoagulation with a limited risk of bleeding. AREAS COVERED: A review of patents literature has retrieved >35 patents on the development of molecules targeting FIX(a) since 2003. Small molecules, antibodies, and aptamers have been developed to target FIX(a) to potentially promote effective and safer anticoagulation. Most of these agents are in the pre-clinical development phase and few have been tested in clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: FIX(a) system is being considered to develop new anticoagulants with fewer bleeding complications. Our survey indicates that the number of FIX(a)-targeting agents is mediocre. The agents under development are diverse. Although additional development is essential, moving one or more of these agents to the clinic will facilitate achieving better clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.