Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34990507›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

The potential for leveraging machine learning to filter medication alerts.

Siru Liu, Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, Charlene Weir, Daniel C Malone, Thomas J Reese, Keaton Morgan, David ElHalta, Samir Abdelrahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence to optimize clinical decision support.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siru LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kensaku KawamotoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-9338
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-6799
Charlene WeirDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-2860
Daniel C MaloneDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Skaggs College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Thomas J ReeseDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1081-1670
Keaton MorganDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9140-4454
David ElHaltaPharmacy Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Samir AbdelrahmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-3259

Funding

University of Utah
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the potential for machine learning to predict medication alerts that might be ignored by a user, and intelligently filter out those alerts from the user's view. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified features (eg, patient and provider characteristics) proposed to modulate user responses to medication alerts through the literature; these features were then refined through expert review. Models were developed using rule-based and machine learning techniques (logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, neural network, and LightGBM). We collected log data on alerts shown to users throughout 2019 at University of Utah Health. We sought to maximize precision while maintaining a false-negative rate <0.01, a threshold predefined through discussion with physicians and pharmacists. We developed models while maintaining a sensitivity of 0.99. Two null hypotheses were developed: H1-there is no difference in precision among prediction models; and H2-the removal of any feature category does not change precision.

resultsA total of 3,481,634 medication alerts with 751 features were evaluated. With sensitivity fixed at 0.99, LightGBM achieved the highest precision of 0.192 and less than 0.01 for the pre-defined maximal false-negative rate by subject-matter experts (H1) (P < 0.001). This model could reduce alert volume by 54.1%. We removed different combinations of features (H2) and found that not all features significantly contributed to precision. Removing medication order features (eg, dosage) most significantly decreased precision (-0.147, P = 0.001).

conclusionsMachine learning potentially enables the intelligent filtering of medication alerts.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMedical Order Entry SystemsHumansMachine LearningMedication ErrorsPharmacistsalert fatigueclinical decision supportmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34990507
PMCPMC9006688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.