Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34990474›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

In search of autophagy biomarkers in breast cancer: Receptor status and drug agnostic transcriptional changes during autophagy flux in cell lines.

Francesca Mascia, Ilya Mazo, Wei-Lun Alterovitz, Konstantinos Karagiannis, Wells W Wu, Rong-Fong Shen, Julia A Beaver, V Ashutosh Rao

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metabolic hallmarks of trastuzumab resistance.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeting HDAC6 to Overcome Autophagy-Promoted Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca MasciaLaboratory of Applied Biochemistry, Division of Biotechnology Review and Research III, Office of Biotechnology Products, CDER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Ilya MazoHIVE Bioinformatics Group, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, CBER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Wei-Lun AlterovitzHIVE Bioinformatics Group, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, CBER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7886-0762
Konstantinos KaragiannisHIVE Bioinformatics Group, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, CBER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Wells W WuFacility for Biotechnology Resource CBER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Rong-Fong ShenFacility for Biotechnology Resource CBER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Julia A BeaverOncology Center of Excellence, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
V Ashutosh RaoLaboratory of Applied Biochemistry, Division of Biotechnology Review and Research III, Office of Biotechnology Products, CDER, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-8049
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USMaryland Oncology Hematology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy drives drug resistance and drug-induced cancer cell cytotoxicity. Targeting the autophagy process could greatly improve chemotherapy outcomes. The discovery of specific inhibitors or activators has been hindered by challenges with reliably measuring autophagy levels in a clinical setting. We investigated drug-induced autophagy in breast cancer cell lines with differing ER/PR/Her2 receptor status by exposing them to known but divergent autophagy inducers each with a unique molecular target, tamoxifen, trastuzumab, bortezomib or rapamycin. Differential gene expression analysis from total RNA extracted during the earliest sign of autophagy flux showed both cell- and drug-specific changes. We analyzed the list of differentially expressed genes to find a common, cell- and drug-agnostic autophagy signature. Twelve mRNAs were significantly modulated by all the drugs and 11 were orthogonally verified with Q-RT-PCR (Klhl24, Hbp1, Crebrf, Ypel2, Fbxo32, Gdf15, Cdc25a, Ddit4, Psat1, Cd22, Ypel3). The drug agnostic mRNA signature was similarly induced by a mitochondrially targeted agent, MitoQ. In-silico analysis on the KM-plotter cancer database showed that the levels of these mRNAs are detectable in human samples and associated with breast cancer prognosis outcomes of Relapse-Free Survival in all patients (RSF), Overall Survival in all patients (OS), and Relapse-Free Survival in ER+ Patients (RSF ER+). High levels of Klhl24, Hbp1, Crebrf, Ypel2, CD22 and Ypel3 were correlated with better outcomes, whereas lower levels of Gdf15, Cdc25a, Ddit4 and Psat1 were associated with better prognosis in breast cancer patients. This gene signature uncovers candidate autophagy biomarkers that could be tested during preclinical and clinical studies to monitor the autophagy process.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAntineoplastic AgentsAutophagyBiomarkers, TumorBortezomibBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsOrganophosphorus CompoundsReceptors, EstrogenAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBortezomibERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesmitoquinoneOrganophosphorus CompoundsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSirolimusTamoxifenTrastuzumabUbiquinone

Identifiers

PMID34990474
PMCPMC8735604
OpenAlexW4206170271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.