Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34990006›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Sharing goals by timely communication improves fishermen's satisfaction with marine protected areas: A case study in the Mediterranean.

José Manuel Perea-Muñoz, Austin Miles, Just Tomàs Bayle-Sempere

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

José Manuel Perea-MuñozDepartamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus Rabanales, 14711, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-1798
Austin MilesCharles River Conservancy, 43 Thorndike Street, S3-3, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Just Tomàs Bayle-SempereDepartamento de Ciencias del Mar y Biología Aplicada - Instituto Multidisciplinar de Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef", Universidad de Alicante, POB 99, 03080, Alicante, Spain. bayle@ua.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-1824
Charles River Associates · USUniversity of Alicante · ESUniversity of Córdoba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are considered as a valid tool for mitigating the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems. Their success depends upon their acceptance by implicated stakeholders and on the integration of the stakeholder groups into their management. This integration is especially important with regard to fishermen, whose interests are the most directly affected by MPAs. The relational coordination method posits that effective communication and supportive relationships among stakeholders result in positive stakeholder behaviors and a more effective management of the system. Applying its principles, we designed a survey to evaluate the satisfaction of fishermen associated with five MPAs in the Spanish Mediterranean and determine what mechanisms affect fishermen's acceptance of MPAs. Our results demonstrate that effective communication is particularly important for good supportive relationships and satisfaction among fishermen and other stakeholder groups, as well as satisfaction with the MPA. Sharing objectives with fishermen through timely communication is the primary mechanism to improve fishermen's satisfaction and ameliorate perceptions towards MPA. To address this issue, we recommend more substantial integration of fishermen in the co-management of MPAs.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFisheriesAnimalsCommunicationEcosystemFishesGoalsPersonal SatisfactionEffective communicationFisheriesMarine conservationMarine protected areasRelational coordination frameworkSupportive relationships

Identifiers

PMID34990006
PMCPMC9005555
OpenAlexW4206013736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.