Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34989969›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Length of stay as quality indicator in emergency departments: analysis of determinants in the German Emergency Department Data Registry (AKTIN registry).

Ronny Otto, Sabine Blaschke, Wiebke Schirrmeister, Susanne Drynda, Felix Walcher, Felix Greiner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of government pyrotechnics ban on emergency department usage rates around the turn of the years.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronny OttoDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. ronny.otto@med.ovgu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5914-1129
Sabine BlaschkeEmergency Department, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Wiebke SchirrmeisterDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Susanne DryndaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Felix WalcherDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Felix GreinerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several indicators reflect the quality of care within emergency departments (ED). The length of stay (LOS) of emergency patients represents one of the most important performance measures. Determinants of LOS have not yet been evaluated in large cohorts in Germany. This study analyzed the fixed and influenceable determinants of LOS by evaluating data from the German Emergency Department Data Registry (AKTIN registry). We performed a retrospective evaluation of all adult (age ≥ 18 years) ED patients enrolled in the AKTIN registry for the year 2019. Primary outcome was LOS for the whole cohort; secondary outcomes included LOS stratified by (1) patient-related, (2) organizational-related and (3) structure-related factors. Overall, 304,606 patients from 12 EDs were included. Average LOS for all patients was 3 h 28 min (95% CI 3 h 27 min-3 h 29 min). Regardless of other variables, patients admitted to hospital stayed 64 min longer than non-admitted patients. LOS increased with patients' age, was shorter for walk-in patients compared to medical referral, and longer for non-trauma presenting complaints. Relevant differences were also found for acuity level, day of the week, and emergency care levels. We identified different factors influencing the duration of LOS in the ED. Total LOS was dependent on patient-related factors (age), disease-related factors (presentation complaint and triage level), and organizational factors (weekday and admitted/non-admitted status). These findings are important for the development of management strategies to optimize patient flow through the ED and thus to prevent overcrowding.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalQuality Indicators, Health CareAdolescentAdultHumansLength of StayRegistriesRetrospective StudiesEmergency departmentLength of stayQuality indicatorRegistry

Identifiers

PMID34989969
PMCPMC9135863
OpenAlexW4205525863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.