ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
The detection of keratoconus using novel metrics derived by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Swept-source optical coherence tomography in ocular surface diseases: anterior segment analysis repeatability and its limits.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The Development and Clinical Application of Innovative Optical Ophthalmic Imaging Techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine through a feasibility study whether anterior and posterior corneal arc length and cross-sectional area measured using anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT) can distinguish between healthy and keratoconic corneas.
methodsPatients diagnosed with keratoconus along with healthy controls underwent AS-OCT. ImageJ was used to determine the central 6 mm anterior and posterior corneal arc lengths and cross-sectional areas. Each length and area was then divided into 1-mm segment and relative differences compared.
resultsTwenty-five eyes from 15 patients with keratoconus, along with 25 eyes from 14 healthy controls were enrolled. There was a statistically significant difference in anterior and posterior corneal arc lengths as well as corneal cross-sectional area (p = 0.006, p = 0.005, p = 0.01, respectively). When selecting for the less advanced keratoconus eye, it was noted that posterior corneal arc length was longer in the paracentral temporal segment (1003 vs. 1010 µm, p = 0.04) and that greater change in corneal cross-sectional areas occurred between adjacent segments in less advanced keratoconus eyes.
conclusionAS-OCT is capable of reliably measuring corneal arc lengths in patients with keratoconus and healthy patients. Both anterior and posterior corneal arc lengths along with central cross-sectional areas are statistically different between healthy and keratoconus eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34989951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.