ArticleProtoplasma2022
Evaluation of the validity of large-scale serial sectioning TEM for three-dimensional reconstruction of rice mesophyll cells and chloroplasts.
Article in Protoplasma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D Reconstruction of MatureBio-protocol · 2026Article
- Electron microscopy-based three-dimensional subcellular imaging of plant male gametophyte.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Structural changes of mesophyll cells in the rice leaf tissue in response to salinity stress based on the three-dimensional analysis.AoB PLANTS · 2024Article
- Research on the evolutionary history of the morphological structure of cotton seeds: a new perspective based on high-resolution micro-CT technology.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Volumetric 3D reconstruction of plant leaf cells using SEM, ion milling, TEM, and serial sectioning.Planta · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Serial sectioning transmission electron microscopy (ssTEM) is a classical method of 3D reconstruction using serial sections obtained with an ultramicrotome. However, producing a long ribbon with homogeneity is difficult. Here, ultramicrotome movement was suspended after producing a ribbon of 15-30 serial sections (cutting intervals, 100 nm), and then, the ribbon was mounted on an individual one-slot grid. However, as this ssTEM method may include influencing factors such as incorrect intervals of section thickness and distortion of sections, which is produced by cutting sections using a diamond knife and beam interaction under TEM observation, qualitative and quantitative data on rice mesophyll cells and chloroplasts were compared with those obtained from a focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) (cutting intervals, 50 nm). No structural distortion in 3D models was observed. In addition, no significant differences in the volume and surface area were observed between the two methods. The surface to volume ratio was significantly affected by the increase in section thickness, but not the difference of methodologies. Our method was useful for observing large volumes of plant cells and organelles, leading to the identification of various sizes and types of chloroplasts. The formation of a chloroplast pocket, which is a structure surrounding other intracellular compartments, was confirmed in rice leaves grown under moderate growth conditions using the ssTEM method. As only four out of 90 chloroplasts formed pocket structures, the formation was considered to be rare under the applied moderate growth conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.