Trial reportClinical oral investigations2022
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) of preschool children's anterior teeth restored with zirconia crowns versus resin-bonded composite strip crowns: a 12-month prospective clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of prefabricated zirconia crowns and resin-bonded composite strip crowns in the restoration of pediatric primary anterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Aesthetic preformed paediatric crowns in primary incisors: a bibliometric study and critical analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Review
- Impact of resin infiltration on self-reported bullying and OHRQoL in children with MIH: a single-arm clinical trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Approaches to correct lower lip sucking in preschool children: a clinical study on effectiveness, oral health-related quality of life impact, and malocclusion improvement.The Angle orthodontist · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic Zirconia Crowns in Children: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Reasons for Crown Failures in Primary Teeth: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Article
- Factors influencing preformed metal crowns and prefabricated zirconia crowns.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Microleakage of luting cements in CAD/CAM pediatric zirconia crowns: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare oral health-related quality of Life (OHRQOL) of preschool children's anterior teeth restored with prefabricated zirconia crowns (ZC) versus resin-bonded composite strip crown (RCSC). MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective clinical trial included 136 children with early childhood caries aged 36-71 months who were assigned into prefabricated ZC and RCSC groups. A total of 344 teeth were restored either with 170 ZCs (49.4%) and 174 RCSCs (50.6%). Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model was to associate the study predictors to the OHRQOL. Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) was used to assess the OHRQOL at 6 and 12 months. Mann-Whitney U test was used in comparing OHRQOL mean scores in the two groups and Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the effect size (r) to measure the intragroup OHRQOL change. A Poisson regression model was used to study potential risk factors associated with the overall OHRQOL.
resultsAfter 12 months, the USPHS parameters of the ZC were significantly superior compared to the RCSC. Overall ECOHIS mean scores in the ZC group were significantly lower than that of the RCSC group at T
conclusionsPreschool children OHRQOL treated with ZC were significantly better than those who received RCSC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: One of the optimum treatment standards in pediatric dentistry is the esthetic demand which has significance on the child's OHRQOL and subsequently child's general health quality of life. It is beneficial to the dentist to identify the influence of esthetic restorations on the OHRQOL of preschool children which aids in future decision-making. The longitudinal nature of the study enables the dentist to identify the changes of children's OHRQOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.