Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34989819›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2022

[Digital systems to support emergency medical service : A Germany-wide cross-sectional survey on current availability, utilization and existing challenges].

Clemens Möllenhoff, Patrick Andreas Eder, Asarnusch Rashid, Christian Möllenhoff, Ingolf Römer, Bogdan Franczyk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Clemens MöllenhoffInstitut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Leipzig, Grimmaische Straße 12, 04109, Leipzig, Deutschland. moellenhoff@rescue-research.de.
Patrick Andreas EderZentrum für Telemedizin Bad Kissingen, Bad Kissingen, Deutschland.
Asarnusch RashidZentrum für Telemedizin Bad Kissingen, Bad Kissingen, Deutschland.
Christian MöllenhoffGelenk- und Gefäßzentrum Mittelfranken, Akademische Lehrpraxis der Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Nürnberg, Schwabach, Deutschland.
Ingolf RömerInstitut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Leipzig, Grimmaische Straße 12, 04109, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Bogdan FranczykInstitut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Leipzig, Grimmaische Straße 12, 04109, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Leipzig University · DELaboklin (Germany) · DEParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIncreasing requirements for documentation, cross-sectoral communication and quality management are leading to increased organizational effort in emergency medical services (EMS). On the one hand, the use of digital information systems in prehospital settings can help to support emergency physicians and paramedics in these tasks and on the other hand, it opens new treatment options such as telemedical care for patients. This work attempts to provide a comprehensive picture of the current use of digital systems for ambulance services in Germany. To do so, the study investigated how widespread various information and communication systems currently are at local EMS stations and ambulances, how they are used by emergency personnel, how they are assessed by users and what challenges currently exist for further expansion and greater acceptance of the users. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted as a nationwide, exploratory online survey among emergency physicians and paramedic professionals in July and August 2020 covering 24 different questions. Participation was called for on the Internet, at EMS stations and in hospital emergency departments. Subsequent data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical methods. Solutions considered included digital documentation and hospital prenotification, interdisciplinary care capacity notification, real-time telehealth services and digital radio units.

resultsIn total, 821 responses of participants from 481 different EMS stations from 382 cities nationwide were included in the evaluation. The availability of the 16 systems surveyed varies significantly throughout Germany, depending on the federal state and application. While basic equipment such as radio units or navigation devices are available on almost all surveyed ambulances, the share which has real-time telehealth applications at their disposal is just 6%. A proportion of 72% reported the usage of any type of digital documentation and 41% used a digital tool for prenotification of emergency rooms in at least one hospital. The emergency staff surveyed were generally open to new technologies and resulting possibilities, such as having an electronic patient care record or transmitting patient data digitally to emergency room. Almost all participants see a benefit in the use of information technology in ambulance service, although slightly more than half considered current implementation as unsatisfactory. Challenges are particularly evident with regard to reliability, hardware, useability and interoperability with third parties, such as dispatch centres and hospitals.

conclusionAlthough information technology systems in German EMS are no longer in their infancy, there is still a long way to go before prehospital emergency care can be considered as extensively and adequately digitalized. A more holistic perspective and networked implementation of all systems and processes involved in emergency response operations can help improve and further spread digital solutions for prehospital emergency care. Incorporating field experience into the development process could contribute to increasing functionality and user acceptance.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAmbulancesCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansReproducibility of ResultsDecision support systemsDigitalizationEmergency medical careMedical information systemsTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34989819
OpenAlexW4205309176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.