Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34989682›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Sequential Data-Based Patient Similarity Framework for Patient Outcome Prediction: Algorithm Development.

Ni Wang, Muyu Wang, Yang Zhou, Honglei Liu, Lan Wei, Xiaolu Fei, Hui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Machine Learning Model for Mortality Prediction among Intensive Care Unit Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Learning Patient Similarity from Genomics for Precision Oncology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Comparative Analysis of Patient Similarity Measures for Outcome Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ni WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8941-0457
Muyu WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1606-5058
Yang ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8788-0383
Honglei LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-4749
Lan WeiInformation Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-3215
Xiaolu FeiInformation Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7498-0249
Hui ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0048-0193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequential information in electronic medical records is valuable and helpful for patient outcome prediction but is rarely used for patient similarity measurement because of its unevenness, irregularity, and heterogeneity.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a patient similarity framework for patient outcome prediction that makes use of sequential and cross-sectional information in electronic medical record systems.

methodsSequence similarity was calculated from timestamped event sequences using edit distance, and trend similarity was calculated from time series using dynamic time warping and Haar decomposition. We also extracted cross-sectional information, namely, demographic, laboratory test, and radiological report data, for additional similarity calculations. We validated the effectiveness of the framework by constructing k-nearest neighbors classifiers to predict mortality and readmission for acute myocardial infarction patients, using data from (1) a public data set and (2) a private data set, at 3 time points-at admission, on Day 7, and at discharge-to provide early warning patient outcomes. We also constructed state-of-the-art Euclidean-distance k-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, random forest, long short-term memory network, and recurrent neural network models, which were used for comparison.

resultsWith all available information during a hospitalization episode, predictive models using the similarity model outperformed baseline models based on both public and private data sets. For mortality predictions, all models except for the logistic regression model showed improved performances over time. There were no such increasing trends in predictive performances for readmission predictions. The random forest and logistic regression models performed best for mortality and readmission predictions, respectively, when using information from the first week after admission.

conclusionsFor patient outcome predictions, the patient similarity framework facilitated sequential similarity calculations for uneven electronic medical record data and helped improve predictive performance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPatient Readmissionacute myocardial infarctiondeep learningelectronic medical recordshealth datainformaticsmachine learningnatural language processingoutcome predictionpatient similaritytime series

Identifiers

PMID34989682
PMCPMC8778569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.