Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34989641›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Jennifer J Lentz, Larry E Humes, Gary R Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Relationships Between Auditory Processing and Cognitive Abilities in Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Requirements of health professionals and affected persons for an App-based dual-task training for hearing impaired older adults - a Delphi survey.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer J LentzDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 1771Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9883-7340
Larry E HumesDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 1771Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-3744
Gary R KiddDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 1771Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

Speech-Recognition Difficulties of the Hearing ImpairedR01AG008293 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HUMES, LARRY E · 1990 to 2018
$5.1M
Individualized Assessment and Prediction of Speech-Recognition Performance In Adults with Age-related Hearing LossR01DC017988 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHEN, YI · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008293NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to examine age effects on various auditory perceptual skills using a large group of listeners (155 adults, 121 aged 60-88 years and 34 aged 18-30 years), while controlling for the factors of hearing loss and working memory (WM). All subjects completed 3 measures of WM, 7 psychoacoustic tasks (24 conditions) and a hearing assessment. Psychophysical measures were selected to tap phenomena thought to be mediated by higher-level auditory function and included modulation detection, modulation detection interference, informational masking (IM), masking level difference (MLD), anisochrony detection, harmonic mistuning, and stream segregation. Principal-components analysis (PCA) was applied to each psychoacoustic test. For 6 of the 7 tasks, a single component represented performance across the multiple stimulus conditions well, whereas the modulation-detection interference (MDI) task required two components to do so. The effect of age was analyzed using a general linear model applied to each psychoacoustic component. Once hearing loss and WM were accounted for as covariates in the analyses, estimated marginal mean thresholds were lower for older adults on tasks based on temporal processing. When evaluated separately, hearing loss led to poorer performance on roughly 1/2 the tasks and declines in WM accounted for poorer performance on 6 of the 8 psychoacoustic components. These results make clear the need to interpret age-group differences in performance on psychoacoustic tasks in light of cognitive declines commonly associated with aging, and point to hearing loss and cognitive declines as negatively influencing auditory perceptual skills.

Indexed as

Hearing LossSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCognitionHumansMiddle AgedNoisePerceptual MaskingYoung Adultagingcognitionprincipal component analysispsychoacousticsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34989641
PMCPMC8753078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.