ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2022
Gender and risk-taking behaviors influence the clinical presentation of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) association in metastatic and non-metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning based prognostic model for oral squamous cell carcinoma using SEER data and external validation.iScience · 2026Article
- HMGA2 Overexpression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis and EGFR Signaling Activation in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Lymph node metastasis pattern in recurrent and ipsilateral second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Oral cancer in women: clinical profile, risk factors, treatment outcomes and survival predictors in 32 years of experience.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of Oral Cancer in Cyprus: A Population-Based Cancer Registry Study and Policy Implications.Cureus · 2025Article
- Exploring gender-specific prognostic factors and survival outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Insights from a Taiwanese cohort.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Non-smoking, non-drinking, oral squamous cell carcinoma patients are a distinct and clinically significant group.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with lip squamous cell carcinoma after surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma at the Central Referral and Teaching Hospital in West Java, Indonesia.Cancer management and research · 2024Article
- Oral cancer over six decades: a multivariable analysis of a clinicopathologic retrospective study.Brazilian dental journal · 2023Article
- Semi-quantitative assessment of environmental tobacco smoke exposure and its association with the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2023Article
- Gender and risk-taking behaviors influence the clinical presentation of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Article
- Prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a five-year retrospective study in Cluj-Napoca, Romania.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe common risk factors for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are smoking and alcohol abuse. A small percentage of patients, mostly women, are demonstrating oral cancer without the common risk behavior. This study investigates how gender and different patterns of lifestyle factors influence the clinical presentation of OSCC. PATIENTS AND
methodsFrom this retrospective study, demographical and tumor-specific data and lifestyle factors were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using the χ
resultsAmong a total of 308 patients, men represented the majority of smokers (87.2%) and the female cohort were largely non-smokers and non-drinkers (64.9%). For age, tumor site and N-stage it looks like that differences of men and women are driven by the different risk behavior. But if the lifestyle factors are taken into account, we observe contrary effects between men and women for T-, N-, and UICC-stage. For different cancer locations we saw opposite effects with gender and risk profile. These effects are not dose-dependent explainable for gender.
conclusionSome but not all differences in the development of OSCC for men and women are explainable by the respective difference in lifestyle behavior. Some further investigations are necessary to find explanations for the obvious differences between men and women in developing OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.