Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34989108›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2022

Scientific concepts and methods for moving persistence assessments into the 21st century.

Russell Davenport, Pippa Curtis-Jackson, Philipp Dalkmann, Jordan Davies, Kathrin Fenner, Laurence Hand, Kathleen McDonough, Amelie Ott, Jose Julio Ortega-Calvo, John R Parsons and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Making persistence assessment work: Now and in the future.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Russell DavenportSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-4778
Pippa Curtis-JacksonEnvironment Agency, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Philipp DalkmannBayer AG, Crop Science Division, Environmental Safety, Monheim, Germany.
Jordan DaviesLyondellBasell, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kathrin FennerEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Laurence HandSyngenta, Product Safety, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8545-1633
Kathleen McDonoughP&G, Global Product Stewardship, Mason, Ohio, USA.
Amelie OttSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jose Julio Ortega-CalvoInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-5199
John R ParsonsInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-3627
Andreas SchäfferRWTH Aachen University, Institute for Environmental Research, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-2631
Cyril SweetloveL'Oréal Research & Innovation, Environmental Research Department, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7430-7732
Stefan TrappDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8968-6296
Neil WangTotal Marketing & Services, Paris la Défense, France.
Aaron RedmanExxonMobil Petroleum and Chemical, Machelen, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-7906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of a chemical substance's persistence is key to understanding its environmental fate, exposure concentration, and, ultimately, environmental risk. Traditional biodegradation test methods were developed many years ago for soluble, nonvolatile, single-constituent test substances, which do not represent the wide range of manufactured chemical substances. In addition, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) screening and simulation test methods do not fully reflect the environmental conditions into which substances are released and, therefore, estimates of chemical degradation half-lives can be very uncertain and may misrepresent real environmental processes. In this paper, we address the challenges and limitations facing current test methods and the scientific advances that are helping to both understand and provide solutions to them. Some of these advancements include the following: (1) robust methods that provide a deeper understanding of microbial composition, diversity, and abundance to ensure consistency and/or interpret variability between tests; (2) benchmarking tools and reference substances that aid in persistence evaluations through comparison against substances with well-quantified degradation profiles; (3) analytical methods that allow quantification for parent and metabolites at environmentally relevant concentrations, and inform on test substance bioavailability, biochemical pathways, rates of primary versus overall degradation, and rates of metabolite formation and decay; (4) modeling tools that predict the likelihood of microbial biotransformation, as well as biochemical pathways; and (5) modeling approaches that allow for derivation of more generally applicable biotransformation rate constants, by accounting for physical and/or chemical processes and test system design when evaluating test data. We also identify that, while such advancements could improve the certainty and accuracy of persistence assessments, the mechanisms and processes by which they are translated into regulatory practice and development of new OECD test guidelines need improving and accelerating. Where uncertainty remains, holistic weight of evidence approaches may be required to accurately assess the persistence of chemicals. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1454-1487. © 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentBiodegradation, EnvironmentalRisk AssessmentBioavailabilityBiodegradabilityBiodegradationDegradation half-livesPersistence assessment

Identifiers

PMID34989108
PMCPMC9790601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.