Observational studyNursing in critical care2022
Quality of the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation tool during nurse-physician calls in the ICU: An observational study.
Observational study in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of a PEWS-integrated electronic SBAR handover model for pediatric inpatients: A nonconcurrent controlled study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Application of the modified Mini-CEX combined with the SBAR model in the experimental teaching of health assessment course: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Assessment of clinical handover among ICU nurses based on the structured ISBAR model (2025).BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Exploring Practices During Nursing Handovers in Critical Care: An Anthropological Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Determining the Effectiveness of a Clinical Nursing Teaching Intervention in Improving Teamwork Ability: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of mind mapping combined with the SBAR shift turnover model on reducing nursing defects during bedside shift turnovers after cardiac stenting in cardiology.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Quality of the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation tool during nurse-physician calls in the ICU: An observational study.Nursing in critical care · 2022Observational
- Article
- Teaching Interprofessional Communication in Midwifery Students Using the SBAR Tool.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSituation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) is a tool for structuring communication between healthcare professionals. SBAR reduces medical errors, however few studies have evaluated its quality in real practice.
aimsTo describe the quality of SBAR utilization by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses during phone conversations with physicians. To assess the influence of nurses' training, professional experience, and call circumstances on this quality. STUDY
designThis observational study was conducted in the adult ICU of a university hospital in French speaking Switzerland. All consecutive telephone calls from nurses to physicians during a calendar month, were recorded. Those related to a change in patients' clinical status were selected and analysed. The quality of SBAR utilization was assessed using a pre-defined analysis grid. Scores ranged from 0 (worst quality) to 100% (best quality). Nurses' sociodemographics and training record were collected. Multiple regression was used to assess determinants of SBAR quality including nurses characteristics and level of training.
resultsWe analysed 290 phone calls, made by 99 nurses. The median SBAR quality score was 41% (interquartile range [IQR] 33-48). Quality scores varied across the four items of SBAR: Situation 88% (81-94), Background 17% (6-27), Assessment 17% (0-33), and Recommendation 33% (17-40). Factors independently associated with higher SBAR quality were age (-0.66%, p = .002, 95% CI [-1.07; -0.25]), primary language other than French (-8.40%, p = .017, 95% CI [-15.29; -1.51]), lack of ICU expertise (-9.25%, p = .013, 95% CI [-16.5;1-1.99]), and SBAR training in pre-graduate nursing education (+11.53%, p = .028, 95% CI [1.27; 22.79]).
conclusionsThe quality of SBAR utilization remains low in ICU clinical practice. Pre- and post-graduate training seem to improve its quality. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Pre-graduate mandatory training associated with multiple repetitions could improve nurses' SBAR utilization. Training using the SBAR tool should be combined with the development of nursing skills in assessment and clinical judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.