Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34989068›Full record

Observational studyNursing in critical care2022

Quality of the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation tool during nurse-physician calls in the ICU: An observational study.

Emil Scolari, Leda Soncini, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Antoine Guillaume Schneider

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emil ScolariAdult intensive care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7910-4309
Leda SonciniAdult intensive care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anne-Sylvie RameletInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-2920
Antoine Guillaume SchneiderAdult intensive care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0576-7094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSituation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) is a tool for structuring communication between healthcare professionals. SBAR reduces medical errors, however few studies have evaluated its quality in real practice.

aimsTo describe the quality of SBAR utilization by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses during phone conversations with physicians. To assess the influence of nurses' training, professional experience, and call circumstances on this quality. STUDY

designThis observational study was conducted in the adult ICU of a university hospital in French speaking Switzerland. All consecutive telephone calls from nurses to physicians during a calendar month, were recorded. Those related to a change in patients' clinical status were selected and analysed. The quality of SBAR utilization was assessed using a pre-defined analysis grid. Scores ranged from 0 (worst quality) to 100% (best quality). Nurses' sociodemographics and training record were collected. Multiple regression was used to assess determinants of SBAR quality including nurses characteristics and level of training.

resultsWe analysed 290 phone calls, made by 99 nurses. The median SBAR quality score was 41% (interquartile range [IQR] 33-48). Quality scores varied across the four items of SBAR: Situation 88% (81-94), Background 17% (6-27), Assessment 17% (0-33), and Recommendation 33% (17-40). Factors independently associated with higher SBAR quality were age (-0.66%, p = .002, 95% CI [-1.07; -0.25]), primary language other than French (-8.40%, p = .017, 95% CI [-15.29; -1.51]), lack of ICU expertise (-9.25%, p = .013, 95% CI [-16.5;1-1.99]), and SBAR training in pre-graduate nursing education (+11.53%, p = .028, 95% CI [1.27; 22.79]).

conclusionsThe quality of SBAR utilization remains low in ICU clinical practice. Pre- and post-graduate training seem to improve its quality. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Pre-graduate mandatory training associated with multiple repetitions could improve nurses' SBAR utilization. Training using the SBAR tool should be combined with the development of nursing skills in assessment and clinical judgment.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPhysiciansAdultCommunicationHumansMedical ErrorsSwitzerlandcommunicationcritical careSituation-Background-Assessment-RecommendationTeamSTEPPStelephone calls

Identifiers

PMID34989068
PMCPMC10078777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.