Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988975›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2022

Topical treatment of actinic keratoses in organ transplant recipients: a feasibility study for SPOT (Squamous cell carcinoma Prevention in Organ transplant recipients using Topical treatments).

Zeeshaan-Ul Hasan, Ikhlaaq Ahmed, Rubeta N Matin, Victoria Homer, John T Lear, Ferina Ismail, Tristan Whitmarsh, Adele C Green, Jason Thomson, Alan Milligan and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Skin Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Interventions After First Post-Transplant Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Proposed Decision Framework.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeeshaan-Ul HasanDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3391-2730
Ikhlaaq AhmedCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rubeta N MatinDepartment of Dermatology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Victoria HomerCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
John T LearDepartment of Dermatology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK and Manchester Academic Science Centre, Manchester University, UK.
Ferina IsmailRoyal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Tristan WhitmarshInstitute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK.
Adele C GreenCancer Research UK, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-4841
Jason ThomsonDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Alan MilliganRoyal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sarah HoganDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Vanessa Van-de-VeldeDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Liza Mitchell-WorsfordDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jonathan KentleyDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-6199
Claire GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Yolande Jefferson-HulmeCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sarah J BowdenCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Piers GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Keith WheatleyCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Charlotte M ProbyJacqui Wood Cancer Centre, University of Dundee.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-4836
Catherine A HarwoodDepartment of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK · GBChurchill Hospital · GBInstitute of Astronomy · RUQueen Mary University of London · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25354Medical Research Council MR/T001720/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is significantly increased in organ transplant recipients (OTRs). Clearance of actinic keratoses (AKs) is generally regarded as a surrogate biomarker for cSCC prevention. OTR-cSCC chemoprevention with topical AK treatments has not been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), although there is evidence that 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be chemoprotective in immunocompetent patients.

objectivesTo assess the feasibility, activity and evaluation outcomes relevant to the design of a future phase III RCT of topical cSCC chemoprevention in OTRs.

methodsOTRs with 10 or more AKs in predefined areas were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to topical 5-FU, 5% imiquimod (IMIQ) or sunscreen (sun-protective factor 30+) in a phase II, open-label RCT over 15 months. Feasibility outcomes included proportions of eligible OTRs randomized, completing treatment and willing to be re-treated. AK activity [AK clearance, new AK development, patient-centred outcomes (toxicity, health-related quality of life, HRQoL)] and evaluation methodology (clinical vs. photographic) were assessed.

resultsForty OTRs with 903 AKs were randomized. All feasibility outcomes were met (56% of eligible OTRs were randomized; 89% completed treatment; 81% were willing to be re-treated). AK activity analyses found 5-FU and IMIQ were superior to sunscreen for AK clearance and prevention of new AKs. 5-FU was more effective than IMIQ in AK clearance and prevention in exploratory analyses. Although toxicity was greater with 5-FU, HRQoL outcomes were similar.

conclusionsTrials of topical AK treatments in OTRs for cSCC chemoprevention are feasible and AK activity results support further investigation of 5-FU-based treatments in future phase III trials. What is already known about this topic? Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is significantly more common in immunocompromised individuals including organ transplant recipients (OTRs) compared with immunocompetent populations. cSCC chemoprevention activity of sunscreen and 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) actinic keratosis (AK) treatments has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in immunocompetent populations but not in OTRs. AKs are cSCC precursors and their clearance and prevention are generally regarded as surrogate endpoint biomarkers for potential cSCC chemoprevention activity. What does this study add? SPOT (SCC Prevention in OTRs using Topical treatments) has confirmed that RCTs of OTR-cSCC chemoprevention with topical AK treatments are feasible. It also suggests that topical 5-FU may be superior to 5% imiquimod and sunscreen in AK clearance and prevention. Together with recent evidence from several RCTs in the general population, these data provide a compelling rationale for further studies of intervention with 5-FU-based topical chemoprevention approaches in OTR-cSCC prevention.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellKeratosis, ActinicOrgan TransplantationFeasibility StudiesFluorouracilHumansImiquimodSunscreening AgentsTransplant RecipientsTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilImiquimodSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID34988975
PMCPMC9543168
OpenAlexW4206685136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.