Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988936›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances production by Enterococcus faecium 135 in co-culture with Ligilactobacillus salivarius and Limosilactobacillus reuteri.

Anna Carolina Meireles Piazentin, Carlos Miguel Nóbrega Mendonça, Marisol Vallejo, Solange I Mussatto, Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Innovations in process engineering approaches for enhanced bacteriocin production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. PQS and pyochelin inMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Carolina Meireles PiazentinDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue, São Paulo, SP, 580, Brazil.
Carlos Miguel Nóbrega MendonçaDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue, São Paulo, SP, 580, Brazil.
Marisol VallejoFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de La Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Sede Trelew, Chubut, Argentina.
Solange I MussattoDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 223, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza OliveiraDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Professor Lineu Prestes Avenue, São Paulo, SP, 580, Brazil. rpsolive@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-804X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance codeFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/25511-1Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF20SA0066233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and probiotic cultures in the breeding of animals such as poultry and swine are quite common. It is known that those strains can produce bacteriocins when grown in pure culture. However, the production of bacteriocin using co-culture of microorganisms has not been much studied so far. The present study contributes with innovation in this area by embracing the production of bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) by a newly isolated strain of Enterococcus faecium 135. Additionally, the co-cultivation of this strain with Ligilactobacillus salivarius and Limosilactobacillus reuteri was also investigated. The antimicrobial activity of the produced BLIS was evaluated against Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria innocua, Salmonella enterica, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium using two methods: turbidimetric and agar diffusion. In addition, the presence of enterocin genes was also evaluated. The BLIS produced showed a bacteriostatic effect against the bio-indicator strains, and the highest antimicrobial activities expressed by arbitrary units per mL (AU/mL) were obtained against L. monocytogenes in monoculture (12,800 AU/mL), followed by the co-culture of E. faecium with Limosilactobacillus reuteri (400 AU/mL). After concentration with ammonium sulfate, the antimicrobial activity raised to 25,600 AU/mL. Assays to determine the proteinaceous nature of the BLIS showed susceptibility to trypsin and antimicrobial activity until 90 °C. Finally, analysis of the presence of structural genes of enterocins revealed that four enterocin genes were present in E. faecium 135. These results suggest that BLIS produced by E. faecium 135 has potential to be a bacteriocin and, after purification, could potentially be used as an antimicrobial agent in animal breeding.

Indexed as

BacteriocinsEnterococcus faeciumLigilactobacillus salivariusListeria monocytogenesAnimalsCoculture TechniquesSwineBacteriocinsAntimicrobial ActivityCo-cultureEnterococcus faeciumFoodborne pathogens

Identifiers

PMID34988936
PMCPMC8882487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.