Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988887›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2022

Palliative Care Consultations in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Who Receives Palliative Care Consultations and What Does that Mean for Utilization?

Theresa L Williamson, Syed M Adil, Chidyaonga Shalita, Lefko T Charalambous, Taylor Mitchell, Zidanyue Yang, Beth A Parente, Hui-Jie Lee, Peter A Ubel, Monica E Lemmon and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Racial disparities in palliative care among hospitalized older adults with traumatic brain injury.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa L WilliamsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Theresa.Williamson@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-8597
Syed M AdilDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Chidyaonga ShalitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Lefko T CharalambousDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Taylor MitchellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Zidanyue YangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Beth A ParenteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Hui-Jie LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Peter A UbelFuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Monica E LemmonDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Anthony N GalanosDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Jordan M KomisarowDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
Decision Making for Infants with Neurologic ConditionsK23NS116453 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEMMON, MONICA · 2020 to 2024
$942k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS116453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care has the potential to improve goal-concordant care in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Our primary objective was to illuminate the demographic profiles of patients with sTBI who receive palliative care encounters (PCEs), with an emphasis on the role of race. Secondary objectives were to analyze PCE usage over time and compare health care resource utilization between patients with or without PCEs.

methodsThe National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients age  ≥  18 who had a diagnosis of sTBI, defined by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. PCEs were defined by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code V66.7 and trended from 2001 to 2015. To assess factors associated with PCE in patients with sTBI, we performed unweighted generalized estimating equations regression. PCE association with decision making was modeled via its effect on rate of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. To quantify differences in PCE-related decisions by race, race was modeled as an effect modifier.

resultsFrom 2001 to 2015, the proportion of palliative care usage in patients with sTBI increased from 1.5 to 36.3%, with 41.6% White, 22.3% Black, and 25% Hispanic patients with sTBI having a palliative care consultation in 2015, respectively. From 2008 to 2015, we identified 17,673 sTBI admissions. White and affluent patients were more likely to have a PCE than Black, Hispanic, and low socioeconomic status patients. Across all races, patients receiving a PCE resulted in a lower rate of PEG tube placement; however, White patients exhibited a larger reduction of PEG tube placement than Black patients. Patients using palliative care had lower total hospital costs (median $16,368 vs. $26,442, respectively).

conclusionsPalliative care usage for sTBI has increased dramatically this century and it reduces resource utilization. This is true across races, however, its usage rate and associated effect on decision making are race-dependent, with White patients receiving more PCE and being more likely to decline the use of a PEG tube if they have had a PCE.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticPalliative CareHispanic or LatinoHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesHealth care resource utilizationPalliative careRacial disparityTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34988887
PMCPMC9117411
OpenAlexW4206119967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.