Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988874›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary research communications2022

Administration of meloxicam to improve the welfare of mice in research: a systematic review (2000 - 2020).

Ana Tada Fonseca Brasil Antiorio, Jilma Alemán-Laporte, Ana Paula Pauloni de Freitas, Pedro Kenzo Yamamoto, Luciana Cintra, Claudia Madalena Cabrera Mori

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of an HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Exploration of Analgesia Options for Australian Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Tada Fonseca Brasil AntiorioDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. ana.tbrasil@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-3013
Jilma Alemán-LaporteDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Paula Pauloni de FreitasSchool of Food Engineering, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
Pedro Kenzo YamamotoDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Luciana CintraDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Claudia Madalena Cabrera MoriDepartment of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although laboratory animals experience pain as a necessary component of the objectives of experimental protocols, the level of pain should be minimized through use of an adequate analgesic regimen. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam may be beneficial in alleviating post-operative pain in mice, although no regimen has been demonstrated as universally efficacious owing to differences in experimental protocols, strain, sex, and incomplete descriptions of methodology in the literature. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify potential applications of meloxicam for pain management in experimental mice and to evaluate the general quality of study design. Searches of MEDLINE, Scopus and CAB Direct databases elicited 94 articles published between January 2000 and April 2020 that focused on the analgesic efficacy of meloxicam in the management of momentary or persistent pain in mice. The extracted data showed that most articles were deficient in descriptions of housing, husbandry, group size calculation and humane endpoint criteria, while few described adverse effects of the drug. A wide range of dosages of meloxicam was identified with analgesic efficiencies that varied considerably according to the different models or procedures studied. It was impossible to correlate the extracted data into a single meta-analysis because of the differences in experimental protocols and strains employed, the low representation of female mice in the studies, and incomplete descriptions of the methodology applied. We conclude that meloxicam has potential application for pain management in mice but that the dosage must be adjusted carefully according to the experimental procedures. Moreover, authors must take more care in designing their studies and in describing the methodology employed.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalPainAnimalsFemaleMeloxicamMiceAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMeloxicamAnalgesiaAnimal models of painAnimal welfareMeloxicamMiceNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

Identifiers

PMID34988874
OpenAlexW4206327959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.