Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988838›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Effects of Proximal Gastrectomy and Various Clinical Factors on Postoperative Quality of Life for Upper-third Gastric Cancer Assessed using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45): A PGSAS NEXT Study.

Chikara Kunisaki, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Masashi Yoshida, Sohei Matsumoto, Takaaki Arigami, Yoichi Sugiyama, Yasuyuski Seto, Yuji Akiyama, Atsushi Oshio, Koji Nakada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Longitudinal assessment of quality-of-life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Long-term quality of life, financial toxicity, and decision regret following therapeutic and prophylactic gastrectomy for cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Reflux and stenosis after minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique: risk factors and impact of robotic surgery.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Safety, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors in conversion surgery for advanced gastric cancer: a sub-analysis of Japanese patients in the CONVO-GC-1 study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chikara KunisakiDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan. s0714@med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-8766
Kazuhiro YoshidaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Masashi YoshidaDepartment of Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Japan.
Sohei MatsumotoDepartment of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Takaaki ArigamiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Yoichi SugiyamaDepartment of Surgery, JA General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yasuyuski SetoGastrointestinal Surgery/Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji AkiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Atsushi OshioFaculty of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji NakadaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jikei University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is important to determine the effect of clinical factors on several domains (symptoms, living status, and quality of life [QOL]) after gastrectomy to establish individualized therapeutic strategies. This study was designed to determine the factors-particularly surgical method-that influence certain domains after gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer by using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) questionnaire.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide study of PGSAS-45 questionnaire responses retrieved from 1950 (82.5%) patients from 70 institutions who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Of these, 1,538 responses for proximal gastric cancer (1020 total gastrectomies and 518 proximal gastrectomies [PGs]) were examined.

resultsPG significantly and favorably affected four main outcome measures (MOMs): elderly affected 10 MOMs, male sex affected 4 MOMs, longer postoperative period affected 8 MOMs, preservation of the vagus nerve affected 1 MOM, adjuvant chemotherapy affected 1 MOM, clinical stage affected 2 MOMs, and more extensive lymph node dissection affected 2 MOMs. However, the laparoscopic approach had an adverse effect on MOMs and combined resection of other organs had no favorable effect on any MOMs.

conclusionsThis PGSAS NEXT study showed that it is better to perform PG for proximal gastric cancer, even for patients with advanced cancer, to obtain favorable postoperative QOL if oncological safety is guaranteed. Because the MOMs of PGSAS-45 are positively and negatively influenced by various background factors, it also is necessary to provide personalized care for each patient to prevent deterioration and further improve symptoms, living status, and QOL postoperatively.

Indexed as

Postgastrectomy SyndromesStomach NeoplasmsAgedGastrectomyHumansMalePostoperative PeriodQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.