Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988773›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2022

Safety and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score matching.

Zhi-Nuan Hong, Zhenyang Zhang, Zhen Chen, Kai Weng, Kaiming Peng, Jiangbo Lin, Mingqiang Kang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhi-Nuan Hong *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Zhenyang Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Zhen Chen *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Kai WengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Kaiming PengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China.
Jiangbo Lin *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China. jiangbolin8009@sina.com.
Mingqiang Kang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People's Republic of China. kangmingqiang0799@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively identified patients who were treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NICT, n = 27) or chemotherapy alone (NCT, n = 95) at our institution between January, 2017 and April, 2021. The primary end point was 30-day complications. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 3. Secondary end points were interval to surgery, operation time, postoperative thoracic drainage, thoracic drainage tube stay, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias caused by potential confounding.

resultsAll patients included successfully completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy negative margins. Out of 122 eligible patients, 26 patients in NICT group and 52 patients in NCT group were identified by 1:2 PSM. After PSM, the clinical stage was matched and demographic characteristics of the two groups were well balanced, including age, gender, BMI, ASA status, age-adjusted Charlson index, smoking, drinking, chemotherapy regimens, neoadjuvant cycle, tumor location, lymphadenectomy, pathological stage, histologic sub-type, anastomotic position, route of gastric conduit, procedure type, and operative approach were comparable between groups after PSM. Although NICT group had a higher incidence of pneumonia and pleural effusion, however, the CCI index, other complication and major complications were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, thoracic drainage tube stays, thoracic drainage volume, ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay and hospital cost. Furthermore, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, ICU readmission were similar in both groups.

conclusionsBased on our preliminary experience, esophagectomy is safe and feasible following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyNeoadjuvant chemotherapyNeoadjuvant immunotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.