ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Evaluation of carotid intima media thickness measurement from ultrasound images.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with coronary slow flow: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Reliability of B-mode ultrasound measurement of carotid intima-media thickness in assessing cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of high-resolution flow-mediated dilation using a 24-MHz probe to assess endothelial dysfunction: comparison of hypertensive and normotensive groups.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Relationship of Thyroid Volume and Function with Carotid and Femoral Intima-Media Thickness in Euthyroid People Aged 18-65 Taking into Account the Impact of Diabetes, Hypertension, and Excess Body Mass.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Fat Distribution and Metabolic Diseases on Cerebral Microcirculation: A Multimodal Study on Type 2 Diabetic and Obese Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Utility of vector flow mapping technology in quantitative assessment of carotid wall shear stress in hypertensive patients: A preliminary study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A third of deaths in the world are due to cardiovascular diseases [1]. Atherosclerosis is the major cause of myocardial infarction, which occurs by deposition of plaque in the coronary artery. The chance of stroke rises with the thickening of carotid artery due to the plaque. Hence, accurate measurement of the intima-media thickness is necessary for predicting the chance of stroke. The stopping criterion and active resampling are incorporated in greedy snake segmentation technique. This modified algorithm segmented and extracted the intima-media complex in the ultrasound images. The snake control points obtained from the boundary of the region of interest forms the contour and demarcates the boundary of intima-media complex. The thickness ± standard deviation and the intra-observer error values obtained by modified algorithm are in conformity with the measurements by expert. The intra-observer error values for greedy snake segmentation methods were 0.10 and 0.09 for manual snake initialization and automatic snake initialization, respectively. Shapiro-Wilk test and One-way ANOVA test explains there is no statistical difference between group means obtained from these segmentation techniques and the expert measurement. The statistical analysis proves values of the intima-media thickness obtained from both snake segmentation techniques are very close to expert measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34988763What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.