ArticleJournal of biological physics2022
The identifiability of gene regulatory networks: the role of observation data.
Article in Journal of biological physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian inference of gene regulatory networks at stochastic steady state.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Bayesian Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks at Stochastic Steady State.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Boolean network sketches: a unifying framework for logical model inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying gene regulatory networks (GRN) from observation data is significant to understand biological systems. Conventional studies focus on improving the performance of identification algorithms. However, besides algorithm performance, the GRN identification is strongly depended on the observation data. In this work, for three GRN S-system models, three observation data collection schemes are used to perform the identifiability test procedure. A modified genetic algorithm-particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed to implement this task, including the multi-level mutation operation and velocity limitation strategy. The results show that, in scheme 1 (starting from a special initial condition), the GRN systems are of identifiability using the sufficient transient observation data. In scheme 2, the observation data are short of sufficient system dynamic. The GRN systems are not of identifiability even though the state trajectories can be reproduced. As a special case of scheme 2, i.e., the steady-state observation data, the equilibrium point analysis is given to explain why it is infeasible for GRN identification. In schemes 1 and 2, the observation data are obtained from zero-input GRN systems, which will evolve to the steady state at last. The sufficient transient observation data in scheme 1 can be obtained by changing the experimental conditions. Additionally, the valid observation data can be also obtained by means of adding impulse excitation signal into GRN systems (scheme 3). Consequently, the GRN systems are identifiable using scheme 3. Owing to its universality and simplicity, these results provide a guide for biologists to collect valid observation data for identifying GRNs and to further understand GRN dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.