Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988606›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2022

Visual grading experiments and optimization in CBCT dental implantology imaging: preliminary application of integrated visual grading regression.

Ahmed Al-Humairi, Ryan H L Ip, Kelly Spuur, Xiaoming Zheng, Boyen Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed Al-HumairiSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia. a.alihumairi@uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-1878
Ryan H L IpSchool of Computing, Mathematics and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-1891
Kelly SpuurSchool of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0285-9962
Xiaoming ZhengSchool of Dentistry and Medical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-2624
Boyen HuangDepartment of Primary Dental Care, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-7447
Charles Sturt University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study uses a general formulation of integrated visual grading regression (IVGR) and applies it to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan data related to anatomical landmarks for dental implantology. The aim was to assess and predict a minimum acceptable dose for diagnostic imaging and reporting. A skull phantom was imaged with a CBCT unit at various diagnostic exposures. Key anatomical landmarks within the images were independently reviewed by three trained observers. Each provided an overall image quality score. Statistical analysis was carried out to examine the acceptability of the images taken, using an IVGR analysis that was formulized as a three-stage protocol including defining an integrated score, development of an ordinal regression, and investigation of the possibility for dose reduction through estimated parameters. For a unit increase in the logarithm of radiation dose, the odds ratio that the integrated score for an image assessed by observers being rated in a higher category was 3.940 (95% confidence interval: 1.016-15.280). When assessed by the observers, the minimum dose required to achieve a 75% probability for an image to be classified as at least acceptable was 1346.91 mGy·cm

Indexed as

Spiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageReproducibility of ResultsCone beam computed tomographyDental implantologyDose optimizationImage qualityIntegrated visual grading regressionMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID34988606
OpenAlexW3217274251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.