ReviewResuscitation plus2022
Revisiting EEG as part of the multidisciplinary approach to post-cardiac arrest care and prognostication: A review.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early EEG and serum biomarkers for prognostication after cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Electroencephalography (EEG) for Neurological Prognostication in Post-Anoxic Coma Following Cardiac Arrest and Its Relationship to Outcome.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Brain health: A concern for anaesthesiologists and intensivists.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024Review
- Utility and rationale for continuous EEG monitoring: a primer for the general intensivist.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Preliminary Prognostication for Good Neurological Outcomes in the Early Stage of Post-Cardiac Arrest Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Electroencephalographic monitoring of brain activity during cardiac arrest: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the 1960s, EEG has been used to assess the neurologic function of patients in the hours and days after cardiac arrest. Accurate and reliable prognostication after cardiac arrest is vital for tailoring aggressive patient care for those with a high likelihood of recovery and setting appropriate goals of care for those who have a high likelihood of a poor outcome. Attempts to define EEG's role in this process has evolved over the years. In this review, we provide important historical context about EEG's use, it's perceived unreliability in the post-cardiac arrest patient in the past and provide a detailed analysis of how this role has changed recently. A review of the 71 most recent and highest quality studies demonstrates that the introduction of a uniform classification and a timed approach to EEG analysis have positioned EEG as a complementary tool in the multimodal approach for prognostication. The review was created and intended for medical staff in the intensive care units and emphasizes EEG patterns and timing which portend both favorable and poor prognoses. Also, the review addresses the overall quality of the existing studies and discusses future directions to address the knowledge gaps in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.