ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2021
A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Filipino and Hiligaynon Versions of the Parts IIIB (Non-Motor Features) and IV (Activities of Daily Living) of the X-Linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism- MDSP Rating Scale.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionX-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is a progressive movement disorder which also encompasses non-motor features and alterations in activities of daily living. The study aims to translate the Parts IIIB (Non-Motor Features) and IV (Activities of Daily Living) of the XDP-Movement Disorder Society of Philippines Rating Scale to Filipino and Hiligaynon and subsequently validate these versions, which are more understandable to the natives given that XDP originated from the Panay Islands in the Philippines.
methodsThis is a cross-cultural, cross-sectional validation study, composed of the following steps: forward translation, backward translation, panel reconciliation, pretesting, and field testing. Two sets of 10 XDP patients were recruited to the Filipino and Hiligaynon groups for pretesting and cognitive debriefing while another 2 sets of 50 XDP patients were assigned for field testing.
resultsThe Filipino version had a good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.951 during the pretesting and 0.886 during the field testing. Similar results were seen in the Hiligaynon version (0.837; 0.900). Both also had good conceptual equivalence as demonstrated by significant Pearson r values of 0.384 to 0.814 for the Filipino and 0.355 to 0.800 for the Hiligaynon versions.
conclusionThe Filipino and Hiligaynon versions of the Parts IIIB and IV of the XDP-MDSP scale are internally valid and reliable. These scales are considered acceptable to assess the severity of the non-motor features and difficulties in activities of daily living among XDP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.