Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988365›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2021

Assessment of Capsule Endoscopy Utilizing Capsocam Plus in Patients With Suspected Small Bowel Disease Including Pilot Study With Remote Access Patients During Pandemic.

Chasyn Enns, Cherry Galorport, George Ou, Robert Enns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Robotic Pills as Innovative Personalized Medicine Tools: A Mini Review.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chasyn EnnsDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Cherry GalorportDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
George OuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Robert EnnsDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapsoCam Plus is a capsule endoscopy (CE) system that utilizes four cameras to capture a panoramic view. This has theoretical advantage over conventional forward-viewing CE with limited field of view. Its ease of administration without requiring any additional equipment during the recording also provides a unique opportunity for patients to self-administer the test. We aimed to evaluate real-life experience using this novel system and to determine feasibility of a remote access program.

methodsRetrospective chart review was conducted for consecutive adult outpatients who underwent CE using CapsoCam Plus. Patients with significant challenges for in-person procedures were selected for remote access through mail courier services. Gastric transit time, small bowel transit time, completion rate, diagnostic yield and adverse events were compared between remote access versus usual practice.

resultsNinety-four patients (52.1% male) were included, with 28 in remote access program. Most common indication was gastrointestinal bleeding (85.1%). Complete examination was achieved in 87 patients. Five (5.3%) patients' capsule remained in stomach during the recording, while two (2.1%) patients missed capsule retrieval. Median small bowel and gastric transit times were 231.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 169.5-308.2) and 27.6 (IQR 13.8-63.5) minutes, respectively. Diagnostic yield was 23.4%. There was no difference in completion rate or transit times between two groups, but diagnostic yield was higher in remote access group (odds ratio 3.80, 95% confidence interval 1.28-11.31). One patient required elective endoscopic retrieval of capsule.

conclusionCapsoCam Plus can be safely administered remotely with a high degree of success, which may facilitate timely investigations while limiting nonessential physical interactions during pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID34988365
PMCPMC8697548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.