Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988200›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Efficacy and safety of neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wentao Ji, Xiaoting Zhang, Jia Liu, Guolin Sun, Xiandong Wang, Lulong Bo, Xiaoming Deng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reply to "Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wentao Ji *Faculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoting Zhang *Faculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jia Liu *Faculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Guolin SunFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiandong WangFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Lulong BoFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoming DengFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Changhai Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the antagonistic effect of neostigmine on muscle relaxation is still controversial, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neostigmine for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients recovering from general anesthesia.

methodsMultiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), were electronically searched up to August 2021. Relevant studies on the use of neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients under general anesthesia were retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from the retrieved studies, and assessed their risk of bias. Review Manager 5.2 was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neostigmine based on the included articles. Heterogeneity and related subgroup, sensitivity, and bias analyses were carried out.

resultsThe analysis included 14 studies involving 2,109 patients, including 1,209 in the neostigmine group and 990 in the control group. Results from the random-effects model showed that neostigmine reduced the length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit [mean difference (MD) =-17.73; 95% confidential interval (CI): -22.06 to -13.41; P<0.0001], the time to recovery of train-of-four ratio ≥0.9 (MD =-16.60; 95% CI: -23.67 to -9.52; P<0.0001), and the extubation time (MD =-16.69; 95% CI: -28.22 to -5.17; P=0.005). However, no difference was observed in adverse events between the neostigmine and control groups [odds ratio (OR) =0.97; 95% CI: 0.84-1.12; P=0.71]. Subgroup analyses adjusted for the dosage of neostigmine had no effect on the above results.

conclusionsNeostigmine can effectively and safely enhance neuromuscular recovery from non-depolarizing muscle relaxants in patients under general anesthesia.

Indexed as

anesthesiaNeostigmineneuromuscular blockade

Identifiers

PMID34988200
PMCPMC8667102
OpenAlexW3212808526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.