ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Application of a novel magnetic anchoring and traction technique in thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a swine experiment.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of magnetic-anchoring vs conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung resection: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- The development and application of magnetic surgery in clinical treatment.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Clinical feasibility of laparoscopic left lateral segment liver resection with magnetic anchor technique: The first clinical study from China.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective traction and dissection of the esophagus are key steps during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. In traditional methods, a separate trocar for the traction instruments or thoracic punctures are adopted to externally retract the esophageal loop. However, both methods bring about chest wall damage that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The magnetic anchoring and traction system can not only achieve exposure and pulling multi-directional flexible but also reduce the number of transthoracic ports and trocars used, and then avoid the chopstick effect in surgery. We aimed to verify the feasibility and safety of a self-designed magnetic anchoring and traction system in assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
methodsTen healthy pigs were used as the experimental objects. A magnetic anchoring and traction system composed of an external unit and internal unit was designed, then the requirements and stress characteristics of esophageal pulling and exposure during thoracoscopic esophagectomy were analyzed. The internal unit was introduced through the 5th intercostal space port and was secured to the right wall of the esophagus, the external unit was placed on the surface of the chest wall to allow pairing with the internal unit. The external unit was moved on the chest wall to help exposing operative field.
resultsTen pigs underwent a 3-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy using a magnetic anchoring and traction technique, and all operations were successful. The system provided adequate traction force to pull the esophagus. The external unit could move freely outside the chest wall, enabling suitable positioning of the esophagus for dissection.
conclusionsThe novel magnetic anchoring and traction system in thoracoscopic esophagectomy is safe and feasible, and has the potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.