Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34988038›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Above and Beyond Robotic Surgery and 3D Modelling in Paediatric Cancer Surgery.

Laura Privitera, Irene Paraboschi, Kate Cross, Stefano Giuliani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Robotically Assisted Surgery in Children-A Perspective.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Surgical Advances in Paediatric Neuroblastoma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura PriviteraWellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Irene ParaboschiWellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kate CrossDepartment of Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Stefano GiulianiWellcome/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T005491/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the survival rates for children's cancers have more than doubled in the last few decades, the surgical practise has not significantly changed. Among the most recent innovations introduced in the clinic, robotic surgery and augmented reality are two of the most promising, even if they are not widespread. The increased flexibility of the motion, the magnification of the surgical field and the tremor reduction provided by robotic surgery have been beneficial to perform complex oncological procedures in children. Besides, augmented reality has been proven helpful in planning for tumour removal, facilitating early discrimination between cancer and healthy organs. Nowadays, research in the field of surgical oncology is moving fast, and new technologies and innovations wich will help to shape a new way to perform cancer surgery. Paediatric surgeons need to be ready to adopt these novel devices and intraoperative techniques to allow more radical tumour resections with fewer complications. This review aims to present the mechanism of action and indications of several novel technologies such as optical imaging surgery, high definition cameras, and intraoperative loco-regional treatments. We hope this will enhance early adoption and more research on how to employ technology for the benefit of children.

Indexed as

cancer imagingchildrenfluorescence-guided surgerynovel intraoperative technologiesoncology surgeryoptical imagingpaediatric surgeryspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID34988038
PMCPMC8721224
OpenAlexW4200536786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.