Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34987996›Full record

ReviewImaging science in dentistry2021

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging examinations for peri-implant bone defects around titanium and zirconium dioxide implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mariana Murai Chagas, Solange Kobayashi-Velasco, Thais Gimenez, Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Imaging science in dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Murai ChagasDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-6620
Solange Kobayashi-VelascoDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-9535
Thais GimenezGraduate Program in Dentistry, Ibirapuera University, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1528-0370
Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CavalcantiDepartment of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-9623
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Ibirapuera · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of imaging examinations for the detection of peri-implant bone defects and compared the diagnostic accuracy between titanium (Ti) and zirconium dioxide (ZrO MATERIALS AND

methodsSix online databases were searched, and studies were selected based on eligibility criteria. The studies included in the systematic review underwent bias and applicability assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool and a random-effect meta-analysis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves were constructed to compare the effect of methodological differences in relation to the variables of each group.

resultsThe search strategy yielded 719 articles. Titles and abstracts were read and 61 studies were selected for full-text reading. Among them, 24 studies were included in this systematic review. Most included studies had a low risk of bias (QUADAS-2). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) presented sufficient data for quantitative analysis in ZrO

conclusionThe diagnostic accuracy of CBCT imaging in the assessment of peri-implant bone defects was similar between Ti and ZrO

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental implantsDiagnostic ImagingZirconium

Identifiers

PMID34987996
PMCPMC8695475
OpenAlexW3215017054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.