ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2021
Post-LASIK keratectasia in the context of a thicker than intended flap detected by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024Article
- Comparison of errors in ablation depth calculation after myopic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with different degrees of myopia: a prospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The corneal flap created in LASIK is responsible for most of its advantages in comparison with surface ablation. However, lamellar dissection of the corneal layers in LASIK can also result in serious complications such as corneal ectasia. A 23-year-old man underwent LASIK for correction of -4.75 -2.00@15 in the right eye and -4.50 -2.00@160 in the left eye with a preoperative thinnest corneal thickness of 518 µm/right eye and 513 µm/left eye in 2009. An intended flap thickness and ablation depth in both eyes were 160 µm and 94 µm, respectively, and subsequently, residual stromal bed thickness was 264 µm/right eye and 259 µm/left eye. Several years after surgery, he was referred for the decreased vision. His corrected-distance visual acuity was 0.50 in both eyes. A scissoring reflex was found in retinoscopy. Orbscan imaging was compatible with keratoconus. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed to measure the LASIK flap. It was much thicker (200 µm) than intended (160 µm), and therefore, the residual stromal bed thickness was much thinner. In summary, keratectasia may develop in cases where thicker than expected flaps result in excessive thinning of the residual stromal bed. The obtained results from this case emphasize and remind the importance of intraoperative measurement of flap thickness and using femtosecond and new criteria for patient selection to avoid post-LASIK keratectasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.