ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of adhesive application timing on the push-out bond strength of four calcium silicate-based cements: a comparative study in vitro.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Shear Bond Strength Between Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials and Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Comparative Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Bacterial cellulose-enhanced MTA versus conventional MTA for indirect pulp capping in primary teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Using Resin-Modified Versus Conventional Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Do Restorative Strategies and Delayed Restoration Improve the Bond Strength to Biodentine? In Vitro Study on Adhesive Restorations on a Calcium Silicate-Based Cement.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025Article
- Influence of irrigants on "bond strength" of "Bio-C Repair and TheraCal LC" in "perforation repair:" AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Effect of different irrigants on the push-out bond strength of biodentine and TheraCal LC when used for perforation repair in simulated condition.Journal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne problem encountered in vital pulp therapy is the dislodgment of biomaterial as the result of the application of mechanical condensation forces for the final restoration of the cavity or occlusal loads. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this
resultsThe interaction effect of time and material on PBS was statistically significant (
conclusionsTheracal showed higher values of bond strength than Biodentine and ProRootMTA at 15 minutes & four hours and may thus be better options for single session of VPT.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.