ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2021
Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scientific Opinion on waiving of the dog studies in the regulatory process of agrochemicals approval.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Guidance on the scientific data requirements for an application for authorisation of a food additive submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Scientific Opinion on the application of physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling for the quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) of developmental neurotoxicity in vitro battery (DNT IVB) data for pesticide active substances.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Specific effects on the reproductive function including fertility relevant for cumulative risk assessment of pesticide residues.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance spinosad.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Review
- Guidance on the scientific requirements for an application for authorisation of a novel food in the context of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Recent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testing.Archives of toxicology · 2024Review
- Review
- Fecal elimination of fluralaner in different carnivore species after oral administration.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Stem cell-based approaches for developmental neurotoxicity testing.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Review
- TKPlate 1.0: An Open-access platform for toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling of chemicals to implement new approach methodologies in chemical risk assessment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Metabolites in the regulatory risk assessment of pesticides in the EU.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Review
- Setting of import tolerance for tricyclazole in rice.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Editorial: Relevance of dog studies for the derivation of health-based guidance values for plant protection products approval.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Candidate Proficiency Test Chemicals to Address Industrial Chemical Applicability Domains forFrontiers in toxicology · 2022Review
- Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparativeEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EFSA asked the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues to deliver a Scientific Opinion on testing and interpretation of comparative
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.