ArticleGene therapy2022
Biodistribution and immunity of adenovirus 5/35 and modified vaccinia Ankara vector vaccines against human immunodeficiency virus 1 clade C.
Article in Gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Clinical Safety of GRAd Vector-Based COVID-19 and HIV Vaccines Supports a Platform Regulatory Approach.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Developing the next-generation of adenoviral vector vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Method validation and assessment of the biodistribution and shedding for adenovirus vector-based vaccine using qPCR and dPCR.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparative Biodistribution Study of Baculoviral and Adenoviral Vector Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Article
- miRNA Pathway Alteration in Response to Non-Coding RNA Delivery in Viral Vector-Based Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously, we developed a chimeric adenovirus type 5 with type 35 fiber (Ad5/35), which has high tropism to dendritic cells and low hepatoxicity. For further clinical use, we constructed two recombinant vectors expressing human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) clade C gag (Ad5/35-Cgag and MVA-Cgag). The biodistribution of the two viral vectors in a mouse model and immunity in monkeys were assessed. The mice received a single intramuscular injection with the vectors alone. The gag gene in the tissues were periodically detected using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The distribution of Ad5/35 was also detected using an in vivo imaging system, followed by luciferase-expressing Ad5/35 administration. We found that Ad5/35-Cgag DNA and luciferase activity were detectable until 8 weeks post-administration, whereas MVA-Cgag was undetectable 72 h post-administration. Furthermore, viral administration did not increase serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels in either mouse or monkey models. Moreover, intramuscular administration of Ad5/35-Cgag induced the gag-specific antibody level and IFNγ-secreting PBMCs, the boost with MVA-Cgag further increased the responses and lasted more than 20 weeks from the initial administration. These data demonstrate that Ad5/35 and MVA vectors are safe for in vivo use, and prime-boost with Ad5/35-MVA vaccines is suitable for clinical use against HIV-1 clade C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.