ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2023
Hypospadias surgery: understanding parental emotions, decisions and regrets.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of autologous platelet-rich treatment in hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- Aberrant methylation of mitochondrial genes as a link between oxidative phosphorylation dysregulation and the pathogenesis of hypospadias: a multiomics and clinical sample study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Comparative study in distal hypospadias repair: a meatal-based flaps technic vs. tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Child genital cutting and surgery across cultures, sex, and gender. Part 2: assessing consent and medical necessity in "endosex" modifications.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper builds an argument about genital surgery in the context of medical treatment of children and young people with variations in sex characteristics. First, I set out what is known from existing research including psychological research, surgical follow-up studies and parental regret studies. Second, I present an analysis of surgeons' talk about children, young people and parents in relation to genital surgery. This paper focuses most specifically on hypospadias surgery, but the argumentation is relevant for other kinds of genital surgery carried out in the context of genital variations. The questions guiding this paper are: what research evidence supports hypospadias surgery and what research evidence brings this surgery into question? How might a new interpretation of the evidence, in light of psychosocial research and human rights concerns, contribute to a new perspective on elective genital surgery on minors with variations in sex characteristics? I draw out implications for clinicians supporting parents to decide whether a surgical pathway is the best option for their child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.