ArticleBMJ open2022
Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Enablers to Leadership in Advanced Practice Nursing: A Systematic Review.International nursing review · 2025Pooled it
- Nurse and pharmacist systemic anti-cancer therapy review clinics and their impact on patient experience and care: A systematic review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptance of a general practice-based supportive intervention for dementia caregivers: the AD HOC trial.European geriatric medicine · 2026Trial
- A Qualitative Exploration of Trainee Nurse Practitioners' Experiences and Readiness to Provide Care for Borderline Personality Disorder in Primary Care.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Stakeholders' interpretations and responses to research as a feature of advanced practice: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Variations in Nurse Practitioner full practice authority in the United States: Difference in difference analysis of access and health Performance at a national level.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of advance care planning engagement among Chinese older adults.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Implementation of the Nursing Associate in the NHS: A Rapid Realist Synthesis to Understand Mechanisms of Integration and Workforce Development.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Review
- Developing an Evaluation Framework Based on Entrustable Professional Activities for Advanced Practice Nurses in China.International nursing review · 2026Article
- Level of health technology assessment process-related skills among doctors in Croatia: a cross-sectional survey study.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Knowledge attitude and practice regarding cancer screening among Chinese medical students.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of the Family and Community Nursing Advanced Practice Scale.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Article
- Workforce Career Development in Public Health, Health Education, and the Health Services: Insights from 30 Years of Cross-Disciplinary National and International Mentoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A new tool to support research capability building.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- A qualitative study exploring the experiences of advanced clinical practitioner training in emergency care in the South West of England, United Kingdom.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2025Article
- Poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in perioperative care: protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Advanced practitioners working with older people in primary care and community settings: a survey of roles and use of technology.International journal for advancing practice · 2024Article
- Empowering nurses and midwives: the evidence-base for the Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme of ESHRE†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Advanced nurse practitioner well-being: A 4-year cohort mixed methods study.Nursing open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
objectiveIn response to growing pressures on healthcare systems, the advanced clinical practice (ACP) role has been implemented widely in the UK and internationally. In England, ACP is a level of practice applicable across various healthcare professions, who exercise a level of autonomy across four domains, referred to as the four pillars of practice (education, leadership, research and clinical practice). A national framework for ACP was established in 2017 to ensure consistency across the ACP role, however current ACP governance, education and support is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to analyse data from a national survey of the ACP role to inform the development and improvement of policies relating to ACP in the National Health Service (NHS) in England.
designA cross-sectional survey with free-text comments.
settingThe survey was distributed across primary and secondary levels of care to three distinct groups in England, including individual ACPs, NHS provider organisations and Trusts and primary care settings.
participantsA total of 4365 surveys were returned, from ACP staff (n=4013), NHS provider organisations and Trusts (n=166) and primary care organisations (n=186).
resultsConsiderable variation was found in role titles, scope of practice, job descriptions and educational backgrounds of ACPs. Differing approaches to governance were noted, which led to inconsistent ACP frameworks in some organisations. A further challenge highlighted included committing time to work across the four pillars of advanced practice, particularly the research pillar. ACPs called for improvements in supervision and continuing professional development alongside further support in navigating career pathways.
conclusionsA standardised approach may support ACP workforce development in England and enable ACPs to work across the four pillars of practice. Due to the wide uptake of ACP roles internationally, this study has relevance across professions for global healthcare workforce transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.