Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34986818›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Predictive determinants of overall survival among re-infected COVID-19 patients using the elastic-net regularized Cox proportional hazards model: a machine-learning algorithm.

Vahid Ebrahimi, Mehrdad Sharifi, Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi, Robab Sadegh, Mohammad Hossein Khademian, Mohsen Moghadami, Afsaneh Dehbozorgi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vahid EbrahimiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrdad SharifiEmergency Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Razieh Sadat Mousavi-RoknabadiEmergency Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. mousavi_razieh@sums.ac.ir.
Robab SadeghEmergency Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein KhademianDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. khademianm@sums.ac.ir.
Mohsen MoghadamiNoncommunicable Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Afsaneh DehbozorgiEmergency Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNarrowing a large set of features to a smaller one can improve our understanding of the main risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to derive a parsimonious model for predicting overall survival (OS) among re-infected COVID-19 patients using machine-learning algorithms.

methodsThe retrospective data of 283 re-infected COVID-19 patients admitted to twenty-six medical centers (affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) from 10 June to 26 December 2020 were reviewed and analyzed. An elastic-net regularized Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression and model approximation via backward elimination were utilized to optimize a predictive model of time to in-hospital death. The model was further reduced to its core features to maximize simplicity and generalizability.

resultsThe empirical in-hospital mortality rate among the re-infected COVID-19 patients was 9.5%. In addition, the mortality rate among the intubated patients was 83.5%. Using the Kaplan-Meier approach, the OS (95% CI) rates for days 7, 14, and 21 were 87.5% (81.6-91.6%), 78.3% (65.0-87.0%), and 52.2% (20.3-76.7%), respectively. The elastic-net Cox PH regression retained 8 out of 35 candidate features of death. Transfer by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (HR=3.90, 95% CI: 1.63-9.48), SpO

conclusionThe results of the machine-learning analysis demonstrated that transfer by EMS, profound hypoxemia (SpO

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsHospital MortalityHumansMachine LearningProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Elastic-netMachine-learningRe-infectionSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34986818
PMCPMC8727465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.