Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34986806›Full record

Observational studyBMC psychiatry2022

Socioeconomic differences in psychiatric treatment before and after self-harm: an observational study of 4,280 adolescents and young adults.

Joonas Pitkänen, Hanna Remes, Mikko Aaltonen, Pekka Martikainen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Joonas PitkänenPopulation Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland. joonas.pitkanen@helsinki.fi.
Hanna RemesPopulation Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko AaltonenInstitute of Criminology and Legal Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pekka MartikainenPopulation Research Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals in higher socioeconomic positions tend to utilise more mental health care, especially specialist services, than those in lower positions. Whether these disparities in treatment exist among adolescents and young adults who self-harm is currently unknown.

methodsThe study is based on Finnish administrative register data on all individuals born 1986-1994. Adolescents and young adults with an episode of self-harm treated in specialised healthcare at ages 16-21 in 2002-2015 (n=4280, 64% female) were identified and followed 2 years before and after the episode. Probabilities of specialised psychiatric inpatient admissions and outpatient visits and purchases of psychotropic medication at different time points relative to self-harm were estimated using generalised estimation equations, multinomial models and cumulative averages. Socioeconomic differences were assessed based on parental education, controlling for income.

resultsAn educational gradient in specialised treatment and prescription medication was observed, with the highest probabilities of treatment among the adolescents and young adults with the highest educated parents and lowest probabilities among those whose parents had basic education. These differences emerged mostly after self-harm. The probability to not receive any treatment, either in specialised healthcare or psychotropic medication, was highest among youth whose parents had a basic level of education (before self-harm 0.39, 95% CI 0.34-0.43, and after 0.29, 95% CI 0.25-0.33 after) and lowest among youth with higher tertiary educated parents (before self-harm: 0.22, 95% CI 0.18-0.26, and after 0.18, 95% CI 0.14-0.22). The largest differences were observed in inpatient care.

conclusionsThe results suggest that specialised psychiatric care and psychotropic medication use are common among youth who self-harm, but a considerable proportion have no prior or subsequent specialised treatment. The children of parents with lower levels of education are likely to benefit from additional support in initiating and adhering to treatment after an episode of self-harm. Further research on the mechanisms underlying the educational gradient in psychiatric treatment is needed.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentAdultChildEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleParentsPsychotherapyPsychotropic DrugsYoung AdultPsychotropic DrugsAdolescenceParental educationPsychiatric treatmentPsychotropic medicationSelf-harmSocioeconomic differencesYoung adulthood

Identifiers

PMID34986806
PMCPMC8728977
OpenAlexW4205796507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.