Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34986548›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology journal2021

Efficacy and safety of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy and short-course radiation therapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-arm phase II clinical trial with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients.

Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Akbar Hafezi, NamPhong Nguyen, Shapour Omidvari, Ahmad Mosalaei, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Mansour Ansari, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alimohammad BananzadehColorectal Research Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali Akbar HafeziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
NamPhong NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Shapour OmidvariBreast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ahmad MosalaeiBreast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Niloofar AhmadlooBreast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mansour AnsariBreast Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad MohammadianpanahColorectal Research Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRHoward University Hospital · US

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery in locally advancer rectal cancer with subgroup analysis between the older and young patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this single-arm phase II clinical trial, eligible patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-4 and/or N1-2) were enrolled. All the patients received a median three sequential cycles of neoadjuvant CAPEOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. A total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions during 1 week was prescribed to the gross tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surgery was performed about 8 weeks following radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and grade 3-4 toxicity were compared between older patients (≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years).

resultsNinety-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. There were 32 older patients and 64 younger patients. Overall pCR was 20.8% for all the patients. Older patients achieved similar pCR rate (18.7% vs. 21.8; p = 0.795) compared to younger patients. There was no statistically significance in terms of the tumor and the node downstaging or treatment-related toxicity between older patients and younger ones; however, the rate of sphincter-saving surgery was significantly more frequent in younger patients (73% vs. 53%; p=0.047) compared to older ones. All treatment-related toxicities were manageable and tolerable among older patients.

conclusionNeoadjuvant SCRT and sequential chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery was safe and effective in older patients compared to young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyColorectal surgeryNeoadjuvant therapyRectal neoplasmsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

Identifiers

PMID34986548
PMCPMC8743455
OpenAlexW3208751936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.