ArticleCurrent protocols2022
Mapping Replication Timing in Single Mammalian Cells.
Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial organization and dynamics of genome replication: from forks to foci.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Asymmetric attrition and secondary chromosome destabilization after double-strand breaks in human embryonic development.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Parallel analysis of replication timing, gene expression, and copy number with PARTAGE.Genome research · 2026Article
- PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- RIF1 controls replication timing in early mouse embryos independently of lamina-associated nuclear organization.Developmental cell · 2025Article
- A multiplicative behavioral model of DNA replication initiation in cells.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- The location and development of Replicon Cluster Domains in early replicating DNA.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Replication timing (RT) is the temporal order in which genomic DNA is replicated during S phase. Early and late replication correlate with transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin compartments, but mechanistic links between large-scale chromosome structure, transcription, and replication are still enigmatic. A proper RT program is necessary to maintain the global epigenome that defines cell identity, suggesting that RT is critical for epigenome integrity by facilitating the assembly of different types of chromatin at different times during S phase. RT is regulated during development and has been found to be altered in disease. Thus, RT can identify stable epigenetic differences distinguishing cell types, and can be used to help stratify patient outcomes and identify markers of disease. Most methods to profile RT require thousands of S-phase cells. In cases where cells are rare (e.g., early-stage embryos or rare primary cell types) or consist of a heterogeneous mixture of cell states (e.g., differentiation intermediates), or when the interest is in determining the degree of stable epigenetic heterogeneity within a population of cells, single-cell measurements of RT are necessary. We have previously developed single cell Repli-seq, a method to measure replication timing in single cells using DNA copy number quantification. To date, however, single-cell Repli-seq suffers from relatively low throughput and high costs. Here, we describe an improved single-cell Repli-seq protocol that uses degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR (DOP-PCR) for uniform whole-genome amplification and uniquely barcoded primers that permit early pooling of single-cell samples into a single library preparation. We also provide a bioinformatics platform for analysis of the data. The improved throughput and decreased costs of this method relative to previously published single-cell Repli-seq protocols should make it considerably more accessible to a broad range of investigators. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) of single cells and sequence library construction. Basic Protocol 2: Deriving and displaying single-cell replication timing data from whole genome sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.